BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2217082)

  • 1. Fermentation of pearl millet flour with yeasts and lactobacilli: in vitro digestibility and utilisation of fermented flour for weaning mixtures.
    Khetarpaul N; Chauhan BM
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1990 Jul; 40(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 2217082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential fermentation of pearl millet by yeasts and lactobacilli--effect on the antinutrients and in vitro digestibility.
    Khetarpaul N; Chauhan BM
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1991 Oct; 41(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 1796089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological utilisation of pearl millet flour fermented with yeasts and lactobacilli.
    Khetarpaul N; Chauhan BM
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1991 Oct; 41(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 1796088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of fermentation on protein, fat, minerals and thiamine content of pearl millet.
    Khetarpaul N; Chauhan BM
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1989 Jun; 39(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 2762245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of various types of fermentation on in vitro protein and starch digestibility of differently processed pearl millet.
    Sharma A; Kapoor AC
    Nahrung; 1996 May; 40(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 8766667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological utilization of naturally fermented pearl millet flour (Pennisetum typhoideum).
    Khetarpaul N; Chauhan BM
    Arch Latinoam Nutr; 1992 Sep; 42(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 1342164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of fermentation on the starch digestibility, resistant starch and some physicochemical properties of sorghum flour.
    Elkhalifa AE; Schiffler B; Bernhard R
    Nahrung; 2004 Apr; 48(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 15146963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancement of nutritional value of finger millet-based food (Indian dosa) by co-fermentation with horse gram flour.
    Palanisamy BD; Rajendran V; Sathyaseelan S; Bhat R; Venkatesan BP
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2012 Feb; 63(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 21696301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fermentation of starch to ethanol by an amylolytic yeast Saccharomyces diastaticus SM-10.
    Sharma S; Pandey M; Saharan B
    Indian J Exp Biol; 2002 Mar; 40(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 12635704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro protein and starch digestibility of pearl millet (Pennisetum gluacum L.) as affected by processing techniques.
    Archana ; Sehgal S; Kawatra A
    Nahrung; 2001 Feb; 45(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11253635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Production of 16.5% v/v ethanol from seagrass seeds.
    Uchida M; Miyoshi T; Kaneniwa M; Ishihara K; Nakashimada Y; Urano N
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2014 Dec; 118(6):646-50. PubMed ID: 24969514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of rabadi fermentation on phytic acid and in vitro digestibility of barley.
    Gupta M; Khetarpaul N
    Nahrung; 1993; 37(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 8510711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probiotic fermentation: effect on antinutrients and digestibility of starch and protein of indigenously developed food mixture.
    Binita R; Khetarpaul N
    Nutr Health; 1997; 11(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 9131698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of lactic acid bacteria fermentation on physicochemical properties of starch from fermented proso millet flour.
    Zhang T; Hong S; Zhang JR; Liu PH; Li S; Wen Z; Xiao J; Zhang G; Habimana O; Shah NP; Sui Z; Corke H
    Food Chem; 2024 Mar; 437(Pt 2):137764. PubMed ID: 37976787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thermal treatments reduce rancidity and modulate structural and digestive properties of starch in pearl millet flour.
    Vinutha T; Kumar D; Bansal N; Krishnan V; Goswami S; Kumar RR; Kundu A; Poondia V; Rudra SG; Muthusamy V; Rama Prashat G; Venkatesh P; Kumari S; Jaiswal P; Singh A; Sachdev A; Singh SP; Satyavathi T; Ramesh SV; Praveen S
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Jan; 195():207-216. PubMed ID: 34890636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of processing method and solute interactions on pepsin digestibility of cooked proso millet flour.
    Gulati P; Sabillón L; Rose DJ
    Food Res Int; 2018 Jul; 109():583-588. PubMed ID: 29803486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the addition of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flour on the in vitro digestibility of starch and undigestible carbohydrates in spaghetti.
    Gallegos-Infante JA; Bello-Perez LA; Rocha-Guzman NE; Gonzalez-Laredo RF; Avila-Ontiveros M
    J Food Sci; 2010 Jun; 75(5):H151-6. PubMed ID: 20629880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of probiotic fermentation on antinutrients and in vitro protein and starch digestibilities of indigenously developed RWGT food mixture.
    Sindhu SC; Khetarpaul N
    Nutr Health; 2002; 16(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 12418801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nutrient content of complementary foods based on processed and fermented sorghum, groundnut, spinach, and mango.
    Oumarou H; Ejoh R; Ndjouenkeu R; Tanya A
    Food Nutr Bull; 2005 Dec; 26(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 16465985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of solid state fermentation on proximate composition, antinutritional factors and in vitro protein digestibility of maize flour.
    Terefe ZK; Omwamba MN; Nduko JM
    Food Sci Nutr; 2021 Nov; 9(11):6343-6352. PubMed ID: 34760264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.