These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22171080)

  • 41. What sets the odds of winning and losing?
    Rutte C; Taborsky M; Brinkhof MW
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Jan; 21(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 16701465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fighting zebrafish: characterization of aggressive behavior and winner-loser effects.
    Oliveira RF; Silva JF; Simões JM
    Zebrafish; 2011 Jun; 8(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 21612540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Some studies on the influence of chlordiazepoxide on the social interaction of golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus).
    Poole TB
    Br J Pharmacol; 1973 Jul; 48(3):538-45. PubMed ID: 4797169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Agonistic experience during development establishes inter-individual differences in approach-avoidance behaviour of crickets.
    Balsam JS; Stevenson PA
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16702. PubMed ID: 34404861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Social eavesdropping: a game-theoretic analysis.
    Mesterton-Gibbons M; Sherratt TN
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 May; 69(4):1255-76. PubMed ID: 17372783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Strategy changes in subsequent fights as consequences of winning and losing in fruit fly fights.
    Trannoy S; Kravitz EA
    Fly (Austin); 2017 Apr; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27834611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The coevolution of transitive inference and memory capacity in the hawk-dove game.
    Doi K; Nakamaru M
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Nov; 456():91-107. PubMed ID: 30077734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Effect of Brief or Prolonged Bouts of Winning or Losing Male-Male Contests on Plasticity in Sexually Selected Traits.
    Harrison LM; Vega-Trejo R; Jennions MD
    Am Nat; 2023 Mar; 201(3):442-459. PubMed ID: 36848507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Social stress in laboratory rats: hormonal responses and immune cell distribution.
    Stefanski V
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2000 May; 25(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10725615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fighting and assessment in male cichlid fish: the effects of asymmetries in gonadal state and body size.
    Neat FC; Huntingford FA; Beveridge MMC
    Anim Behav; 1998 Apr; 55(4):883-91. PubMed ID: 9632475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Winner and loser effects in lobster cockroach contests for social dominance.
    Kou R; Hsu CC; Chen SC; Chang PY; Fang S
    Horm Behav; 2019 Jan; 107():49-60. PubMed ID: 30528558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stickleback fights: why do winners win? Influence of metabolic and morphometric parameters.
    Guderley H; Couture P
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2005; 78(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 15778937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Coalition formation in animals and the nature of winner and loser effects.
    Johnstone RA; Dugatkin LA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Jan; 267(1438):17-21. PubMed ID: 10670947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Winning and losing in public: audiences direct future success in Japanese quail.
    Hirschenhauser K; Gahr M; Goymann W
    Horm Behav; 2013 Apr; 63(4):625-33. PubMed ID: 23454001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A unique neurogenomic state emerges after aggressive confrontations in males of the fish Betta splendens.
    Vu TD; Iwasaki Y; Oshima K; Chiu MT; Nikaido M; Okada N
    Gene; 2021 Jun; 784():145601. PubMed ID: 33766705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The genome of the sea anemone Actinia equina (L.): Meiotic toolkit genes and the question of sexual reproduction.
    Wilding CS; Fletcher N; Smith EK; Prentis P; Weedall GD; Stewart Z
    Mar Genomics; 2020 Oct; 53():100753. PubMed ID: 32057717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Opponent familiarity and contest experience jointly influence contest decisions in Kryptolebias marmoratus.
    Li CY; Yang Y; Lee PY; Hsu Y
    Front Zool; 2014; 11(1):92. PubMed ID: 25530793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Infrared thermography of agonistic behaviour in pigs.
    Boileau A; Farish M; Turner SP; Camerlink I
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Oct; 210():112637. PubMed ID: 31374228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Human third-party observers accurately track fighting skill and vigour along their unique paths to victory.
    Caton NR; Dixson BJW
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):14841. PubMed ID: 36050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Extrinsic effects, estimating opponents' RHP, and the structure of dominance hierarchies.
    Dugatkin LA; Dugatkin AD
    Biol Lett; 2007 Dec; 3(6):614-6. PubMed ID: 17785260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.