179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22171595)
1. Three-dimensional image correlation analyses for strains generated by cement and screw-retained implant prostheses.
Clelland NL; Yilmaz B; Seidt JD
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 22171595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted screw-retained prostheses on short implants.
Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1176-82. PubMed ID: 22167421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of framework design on fracture resistance of metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
de Oliveira JL; Martins LM; Sanada J; de Oliveira PC; do Valle AL
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):350-2. PubMed ID: 20617225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained, cement-retained, and screw-cement-retained implant-supported metal ceramic posterior crowns.
Al-Omari WM; Shadid R; Abu-Naba'a L; El Masoud B
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):263-73. PubMed ID: 20136704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro stress analyses of dental implants supporting screw-retained and cement-retained prostheses.
Kim WD; Jacobson Z; Nathanson D
Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 10635156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture.
Karl M; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 21841982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of an occlusal screw-access hole on the fracture resistance of permanently cemented implant crowns: a laboratory study.
Shadid RM; Abu-Naba'a L; Al-Omari WM; Asfar KR; El Masoud BM
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21519576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis.
Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Traini T; Di lorio D; Caputi S
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
