BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22172536)

  • 1. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T and 7.0 T: a comparison of relaxation times and image contrast.
    Jordan CD; Saranathan M; Bangerter NK; Hargreaves BA; Gold GE
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):734-9. PubMed ID: 22172536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast.
    Gold GE; Han E; Stainsby J; Wright G; Brittain J; Beaulieu C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 15269023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid isotropic resolution cartilage assessment using radial alternating repetition time balanced steady-state free-precession imaging.
    Al saleh H; Hernandez L; Lee KS; Rosas HG; Block WF; Kijowski R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 40(4):796-803. PubMed ID: 24151247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Knee imaging: Rapid three-dimensional fast spin-echo using compressed sensing.
    Kijowski R; Rosas H; Samsonov A; King K; Peters R; Liu F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1712-1722. PubMed ID: 27726244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. T2 Relaxation time quantitation differs between pulse sequences in articular cartilage.
    Matzat SJ; McWalter EJ; Kogan F; Chen W; Gold GE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 25244647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast.
    Duewell SH; Ceckler TL; Ong K; Wen H; Jaffer FA; Chesnick SA; Balaban RS
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):551-5. PubMed ID: 7617876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging--diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T.
    Kijowski R; Davis KW; Woods MA; Lindstrom MJ; De Smet AA; Gold GE; Busse RF
    Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):486-95. PubMed ID: 19703886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo bone and cartilage MRI using fully-balanced steady-state free-precession at 7 tesla.
    Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Banerjee S; Stahl R; Carvajal L; Xu D; Vigneron D; Kelley DA; Link TM; Majumdar S
    Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1294-8. PubMed ID: 17957777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-resolution cartilage imaging of the knee at 3T: basic evaluation of modern isotropic 3D MR-sequences.
    Friedrich KM; Reiter G; Kaiser B; Mayerhöfer M; Deimling M; Jellus V; Horger W; Trattnig S; Schweitzer M; Salomonowitz E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):398-405. PubMed ID: 20138723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study at 3 T of sequence dependence of T2 quantitation in the knee.
    Pai A; Li X; Majumdar S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1215-20. PubMed ID: 18502073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences.
    Altahawi FF; Blount KJ; Morley NP; Raithel E; Omar IM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Jan; 46(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27744578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative in vivo diffusion imaging of cartilage using double echo steady-state free precession.
    Bieri O; Ganter C; Scheffler K
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Sep; 68(3):720-9. PubMed ID: 22161749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D-T1rho quantitation of patellar cartilage at 3.0T.
    Pakin SK; Schweitzer ME; Regatte RR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1357-63. PubMed ID: 17058202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system.
    Chang EY; Du J; Chung CB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):870-83. PubMed ID: 25045018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initial experience with synthetic MRI of the knee at 3T: comparison with conventional T
    Park S; Kwack KS; Lee YJ; Gho SM; Lee HY
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 90(1080):20170350. PubMed ID: 28934866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cartilage morphology at 3.0T: assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging techniques.
    Chen CA; Kijowski R; Shapiro LM; Tuite MJ; Davis KW; Klaers JL; Block WF; Reeder SB; Gold GE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):173-83. PubMed ID: 20578024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-resolution Fourier-encoded sub-millisecond echo time musculoskeletal imaging at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla.
    Deligianni X; Bär P; Scheffler K; Trattnig S; Bieri O
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Nov; 70(5):1434-9. PubMed ID: 23233430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
    Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical value of routine use of thin-section 3D MRI using 3D FSE sequences with a variable flip angle technique for internal derangements of the knee joint at 3T.
    Kudo H; Inaoka T; Kitamura N; Nakatsuka T; Kasuya S; Kasai R; Tozawa M; Nakagawa K; Terada H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1309-17. PubMed ID: 23684241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.