277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22172563)
1. Characterization of the heterotrophic biomass and the endogenous residue of activated sludge.
Ramdani A; Dold P; Gadbois A; Déléris S; Houweling D; Comeau Y
Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):653-68. PubMed ID: 22172563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biodegradation of the endogenous residue of activated sludge.
Ramdani A; Dold P; Déléris S; Lamarre D; Gadbois A; Comeau Y
Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2179-88. PubMed ID: 20074768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biodegradation of the endogenous residue of activated sludge in a membrane bioreactor with continuous or on-off aeration.
Ramdani A; Dold P; Gadbois A; Déléris S; Houweling D; Comeau Y
Water Res; 2012 Jun; 46(9):2837-50. PubMed ID: 22475080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1.
Jiang T; Liu X; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):359-67. PubMed ID: 16459810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics.
Ng HY; Hermanowicz SW
Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):981-92. PubMed ID: 15766953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Active heterotrophic biomass and sludge retention time (SRT) as determining factors for biodegradation kinetics of pharmaceuticals in activated sludge.
Majewsky M; Gallé T; Yargeau V; Fischer K
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Aug; 102(16):7415-21. PubMed ID: 21652206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occurrence, source, and fate of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor.
Meng F; Drews A; Mehrez R; Iversen V; Ernst M; Yang F; Jekel M; Kraume M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(23):8821-6. PubMed ID: 19943652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling the biological performance of a side-stream membrane bioreactor using ASM1.
Tian KJ; Liu XA; Jiang T; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(6):1020-3. PubMed ID: 15900742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Degradation of the unbiodegradable particulate fraction (XU) from different activated sludges during batch digestion tests at ambient temperature.
Habermacher J; Benetti AD; Derlon N; Morgenroth E
Water Res; 2016 Jul; 98():206-14. PubMed ID: 27107138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of membrane bioreactor configurations on sludge structure and microbial activity.
Clouzot L; Roche N; Marrot B
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):975-81. PubMed ID: 20947340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor.
Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater.
Munz G; Gualtiero M; Salvadori L; Claudia B; Claudio L
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8559-64. PubMed ID: 18499451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative performance between intermittently cyclic activated sludge-membrane bioreactor and anoxic/aerobic-membrane bioreactor.
Wang YL; Yu SL; Shi WX; Bao RL; Zhao Q; Zuo XT
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Sep; 100(17):3877-81. PubMed ID: 19362820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena.
Al-Halbouni D; Traber J; Lyko S; Wintgens T; Melin T; Tacke D; Janot A; Dott W; Hollender J
Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1475-88. PubMed ID: 18023465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aerobic stabilization of biological sludge characterized by an extremely low decay rate: modeling, identifiability analysis and parameter estimation.
Martínez-García CG; Olguín MT; Fall C
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 166():112-9. PubMed ID: 24907570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of sludge characteristics and PCR-DGGE based microbial diversity of nanofiltration and microfiltration membrane bioreactors.
Choi JH; Lee SH; Fukushi K; Yamamoto K
Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1543-50. PubMed ID: 17258282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of tannery wastewater and biomass in a membrane bioreactor using respirometric analysis.
Munz G; Gori R; Cammilli L; Lubello C
Bioresour Technol; 2008 Dec; 99(18):8612-8. PubMed ID: 18499445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
