287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22172788)
1. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for assessing prognosis: an update.
Bourque JM; Beller GA
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1305-19. PubMed ID: 22172788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nuclear cardiology: 2014 innovations and developments.
Mahmarian JJ; Chang S; Nabi F
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2014; 10(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 25574344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Tamarappoo BK; Dey D; Nakazato R; Shmilovich H; Smith T; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Berman DS
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1010-9. PubMed ID: 20947046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Feher A; Sinusas AJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28794138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advances in software for faster procedure and lower radiotracer dose myocardial perfusion imaging.
Piccinelli M; Garcia EV
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 25556907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review: comparison of PET rubidium-82 with conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Ghotbi AA; Kjaer A; Hasbak P
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2014 May; 34(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 24028171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct myocardial ischemia imaging: a new cardiovascular nuclear imaging paradigm.
Jain D; He ZX; Lele V; Aronow WS
Clin Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 38(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 25487883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advances in myocardial perfusion imaging.
Dorbala S; Dilsizian V
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):535-6. PubMed ID: 25747901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Myocardial perfusion imaging is a strong predictor of death in women.
Cerci MS; Cerci JJ; Cerci RJ; Pereira Neto CC; Trindade E; Delbeke D; da Cunha CL; Vitola JV
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Aug; 4(8):880-8. PubMed ID: 21835380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent paradigm shifts in molecular cardiac imaging-Establishing precision cardiology through novel
Werner RA; Chen X; Rowe SP; Lapa C; Javadi MS; Higuchi T
Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2020 Jan; 30(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30824163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gender Differences in Radiation Dose From Nuclear Cardiology Studies Across the World: Findings From the INCAPS Registry.
Shi L; Dorbala S; Paez D; Shaw LJ; Zukotynski KA; Pascual TN; Karthikeyan G; Vitola JV; Better N; Bokhari N; Rehani MM; Kashyap R; Dondi M; Mercuri M; Einstein AJ;
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 9(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 27056156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Abbott BG; Case JA; Dorbala S; Einstein AJ; Galt JR; Pagnanelli R; Bullock-Palmer RP; Soman P; Wells RG
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e000020. PubMed ID: 30354679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Serial myocardial perfusion imaging: defining a significant change and targeting management decisions.
Iskandrian AE; Hage FG; Shaw LJ; Mahmarian JJ; Berman DS
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 24433711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress thallium-201/rest technetium-99m sequential dual isotope high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging.
Berman DS; Kang X; Tamarappoo B; Wolak A; Hayes SW; Nakazato R; Thomson LE; Kite F; Cohen I; Slomka PJ; Einstein AJ; Friedman JD
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Mar; 2(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 19356571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cardiac hybrid imaging].
Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
Clin Res Cardiol Suppl; 2011 May; 6():32-42. PubMed ID: 22528176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of appropriate use on the prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
Doukky R; Hayes K; Frogge N; Balakrishnan G; Dontaraju VS; Rangel MO; Golzar Y; Garcia-Sayan E; Hendel RC
Circulation; 2013 Oct; 128(15):1634-43. PubMed ID: 24021779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective.
Techasith T; Cury RC
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Aug; 4(8):905-16. PubMed ID: 21835384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are shades of gray prognostically useful in reporting myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography?
Abidov A; Hachamovitch R; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Cohen I; Kang X; De Yang L; Thomson L; Germano G; Slomka P; Berman DS
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 19808609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is ischemia and how should this be defined based on modern imaging?
Bober RM; Jahangir E
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):537-54. PubMed ID: 25727175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
