312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22173173)
1. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience.
Sivaraman A; Leveillee RJ; Patel MB; Chauhan S; Bracho JE; Moore CR; Coelho RF; Palmer KJ; Schatloff O; Bird VG; Munver R; Patel VR
Urology; 2012 Feb; 79(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 22173173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience.
Mufarrij PW; Woods M; Shah OD; Palese MA; Berger AD; Thomas R; Stifelman MD
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1391-6. PubMed ID: 18707739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: a safe and highly effective treatment option.
Lindgren BW; Hagerty J; Meyer T; Cheng EY
J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):932-7. PubMed ID: 22819409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Atug F; Burgess SV; Castle EP; Thomas R
Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Jan; 60(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 16409421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Kojima Y; Sasaki S; Mizuno K; Tozawa K; Hayashi Y; Kohri K
Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 19383038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: outcomes of an international multi-institutional study of 140 patients.
Rais-Bahrami S; Rizkala ER; Cadeddu JA; Tugcu V; Derweesh IH; Abdel-Karim AM; Kawauchi A; George AK; Autorino R; Bagrodia A; Sonmezay E; Elsalmy S; Liss MA; Harrow BM; Kaouk JH; Richstone L; Stein RJ
Urology; 2013 Aug; 82(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23810729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience.
Palese MA; Stifelman MD; Munver R; Sosa RE; Philipps CK; Dinlenc C; Del Pizzo JJ
J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15865532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases).
Chuanyu S; Guowei X; Ke X; Qiang D; Yuanfang Z
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19660798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned.
Kutikov A; Nguyen M; Guzzo T; Canter D; Casale P
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2237-9; discussion 2239-40. PubMed ID: 17070302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience.
Gupta NP; Nayyar R; Hemal AK; Mukherjee S; Kumar R; Dogra PN
BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(7):980-3. PubMed ID: 19874304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China.
Hong P; Ding G; Zhu D; Yang K; Pan J; Li X; Chen Z; Zhang L; Tang Q; Hao H; Zhou Z; Zhou L
Urol Int; 2018; 101(3):337-344. PubMed ID: 30231235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
