These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22173722)

  • 1. In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses.
    Pospiech P; Nagel F; Gebhart F; Nothdurft FP; Mitov G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Dec; 16(6):1659-67. PubMed ID: 22173722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of thermo-mechanical loading on marginal quality and wear of primary molar crowns.
    Krämer N; Rudolph H; Garcia-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Aug; 13(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 22883357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of long-term simulated RPD clasp attachment/detachment on retention loss and wear for two clasp types and three abutment material surfaces.
    Helal MA; Baraka OA; Sanad ME; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):370-7. PubMed ID: 22443158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
    Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
    Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The abrasion of dental composite by cobalt-chromium clasps.
    Hamirudin MM; Barsby MJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17378453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with class II MOD cavities restored with Ormocer, Nanofilled, and Nanoceramic composite restorative systems.
    Taha DG; Abdel-Samad AA; Mahmoud SH
    Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(7):579-87. PubMed ID: 21716986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of clasp retention forces and abrasion on different cast crowns.
    Jiang N; Gao WM; Zhang H; Zheng DX
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 24423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cyclic loading on occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Teoh SH; Chew CL
    Dent Mater; 2002 Mar; 18(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 11755594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical Behavior of Extensively Restored Premolars: Cusp Deformation, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Resistance.
    Barreto Bde C; Van Meerbeek B; Van Ende A; Sousa SJ; Silva GR; Soares PV; Soares CJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Jun; 17(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 26159126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element stress analysis and fatigue behavior of cast circumferential clasps.
    Sandu L; Faur N; Bortun C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17280890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams.
    Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations.
    Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Lohbauer U; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15810477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, silorane-, and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage.
    Mahmoud SH; Al-Wakeel Eel S
    Quintessence Int; 2011; 42(10):e131-9. PubMed ID: 22026005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial denture clasps.
    Bridgeman JT; Marker VA; Hummel SK; Benson BW; Pace LL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Aug; 78(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 9260137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II ormocer and hybrid resin composite restorations before and after load cycling.
    Kournetas N; Chakmakchi M; Kakaboura A; Rahiotis C; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Sep; 8(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 15248053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.