173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22174264)
21. Dynamic communication between androgen and coactivator: mutually induced conformational perturbations in androgen receptor ligand-binding domain.
Xu X; Yang W; Wang X; Li Y; Wang Y; Ai C
Proteins; 2011 Apr; 79(4):1154-71. PubMed ID: 21322031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High affinity between CREBBP/p300 and NCOA evolved in vertebrates.
Karlsson E; Lindberg A; Andersson E; Jemth P
Protein Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1687-1691. PubMed ID: 32329110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Structural and mechanistic insights into the interaction of the circadian transcription factor BMAL1 with the KIX domain of the CREB-binding protein.
Garg A; Orru R; Ye W; Distler U; Chojnacki JE; Köhn M; Tenzer S; Sönnichsen C; Wolf E
J Biol Chem; 2019 Nov; 294(45):16604-16619. PubMed ID: 31515273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding.
Arai M; Sugase K; Dyson HJ; Wright PE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Aug; 112(31):9614-9. PubMed ID: 26195786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mapping the transition state for a binding reaction between ancient intrinsically disordered proteins.
Karlsson E; Paissoni C; Erkelens AM; Tehranizadeh ZA; Sorgenfrei FA; Andersson E; Ye W; Camilloni C; Jemth P
J Biol Chem; 2020 Dec; 295(51):17698-17712. PubMed ID: 33454008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Binding-induced folding of a natively unstructured transcription factor.
Turjanski AG; Gutkind JS; Best RB; Hummer G
PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Apr; 4(4):e1000060. PubMed ID: 18404207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. NMR relaxation study of the complex formed between CBP and the activation domain of the nuclear hormone receptor coactivator ACTR.
Ebert MO; Bae SH; Dyson HJ; Wright PE
Biochemistry; 2008 Feb; 47(5):1299-308. PubMed ID: 18177052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Leu628 of the KIX domain of CBP is a key residue for the interaction with the MLL transactivation domain.
Arai M; Dyson HJ; Wright PE
FEBS Lett; 2010 Nov; 584(22):4500-4. PubMed ID: 20969867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Recognition of the disordered p53 transactivation domain by the transcriptional adapter zinc finger domains of CREB-binding protein.
Krois AS; Ferreon JC; Martinez-Yamout MA; Dyson HJ; Wright PE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(13):E1853-62. PubMed ID: 26976603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Binding Rate Constants Reveal Distinct Features of Disordered Protein Domains.
Dogan J; Jonasson J; Andersson E; Jemth P
Biochemistry; 2015 Aug; 54(30):4741-50. PubMed ID: 26153298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dual role of protein phosphorylation in DNA activator/coactivator binding.
Dadarlat VM; Skeel RD
Biophys J; 2011 Jan; 100(2):469-77. PubMed ID: 21244843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Molecular dynamics ensemble refinement of the heterogeneous native state of NCBD using chemical shifts and NOEs.
Papaleo E; Camilloni C; Teilum K; Vendruscolo M; Lindorff-Larsen K
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5125. PubMed ID: 30013831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Residual Structure Accelerates Binding of Intrinsically Disordered ACTR by Promoting Efficient Folding upon Encounter.
Liu X; Chen J; Chen J
J Mol Biol; 2019 Jan; 431(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 30528464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evidence of conformational selection driving the formation of ligand binding sites in protein-protein interfaces.
Bohnuud T; Kozakov D; Vajda S
PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Oct; 10(10):e1003872. PubMed ID: 25275445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Folding propensity of intrinsically disordered proteins by osmotic stress.
Mansouri AL; Grese LN; Rowe EL; Pino JC; Chennubhotla SC; Ramanathan A; O'Neill HM; Berthelier V; Stanley CB
Mol Biosyst; 2016 Nov; 12(12):3695-3701. PubMed ID: 27752679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The energetics of the acetylation switch in p53-mediated transcriptional activation.
Eichenbaum KD; Rodríguez Y; Mezei M; Osman R
Proteins; 2010 Feb; 78(2):447-56. PubMed ID: 19731376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fragment screening and druggability assessment for the CBP/p300 KIX domain through protein-observed 19F NMR spectroscopy.
Gee CT; Koleski EJ; Pomerantz WC
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2015 Mar; 54(12):3735-9. PubMed ID: 25651535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Unique structure and dynamics of the EphA5 ligand binding domain mediate its binding specificity as revealed by X-ray crystallography, NMR and MD simulations.
Huan X; Shi J; Lim L; Mitra S; Zhu W; Qin H; Pasquale EB; Song J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74040. PubMed ID: 24086308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative analysis of multisite protein-ligand interactions by NMR: binding of intrinsically disordered p53 transactivation subdomains with the TAZ2 domain of CBP.
Arai M; Ferreon JC; Wright PE
J Am Chem Soc; 2012 Feb; 134(8):3792-803. PubMed ID: 22280219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
