374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22176765)
21. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vertical marginal gap evaluation of conventional cast and computer numeric controlled-milled titanium full-arch implant-supported frameworks.
Alfadda SA
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 25390864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Full-arch metal-resin cement- and screw-retained provisional restoration for immediately loaded implants.
Baig MR; Rajan G
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20553176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology.
Moreno A; Giménez B; Özcan M; Pradíes G
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 23817542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical evaluation of immediate loading of electroeroded screw-retained titanium fixed prostheses supported by tilted implant: a multicenter retrospective study.
Acocella A; Ercoli C; Geminiani A; Feng C; Billi M; Acocella G; Giannini D; Sacco R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e98-108. PubMed ID: 22013945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study.
Jemt T; Henry P; Lindén B; Naert I; Weber H; Wendelhag I
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 12956498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses.
Drago C; Howell K
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):413-24. PubMed ID: 22413997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Metal-ceramic screw-retained implant fixed partial denture with intraoral luted framework to improve passive fit.
Baig MR; Gunaseelan R
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 20932151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Technique for achieving a passive framework fit: a clinical case report.
Swallow ST
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 15119457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry.
Ortorp A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (169):3-88. PubMed ID: 15709359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
