714 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22177626)
1. Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies.
Milby AB; Both S; Ingram M; Lin LL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e477-84. PubMed ID: 22177626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk.
Ahmed RS; Kim RY; Duan J; Meleth S; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 15380585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wang-Chesebro A; Xia P; Coleman J; Akazawa C; Roach M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 17011444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal proton radiotherapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for treatment of pediatric craniopharyngiomas.
Boehling NS; Grosshans DR; Bluett JB; Palmer MT; Song X; Amos RA; Sahoo N; Meyer JJ; Mahajan A; Woo SY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):643-52. PubMed ID: 21277111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mell LK; Tiryaki H; Ahn KH; Mundt AJ; Roeske JC; Aydogan B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protons offer reduced normal-tissue exposure for patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy for resected pancreatic head cancer.
Nichols RC; Huh SN; Prado KL; Yi BY; Sharma NK; Ho MW; Hoppe BS; Mendenhall NP; Li Z; Regine WF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22245197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose-volume comparison of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Vargas C; Fryer A; Mahajan C; Indelicato D; Horne D; Chellini A; McKenzie C; Lawlor P; Henderson R; Li Z; Lin L; Olivier K; Keole S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(3):744-51. PubMed ID: 17904306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The normal tissue sparing obtained with simultaneous treatment of pelvic lymph nodes and bladder using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Søndergaard J; Høyer M; Petersen JB; Wright P; Grau C; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 18759144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-modulated arc therapy for treatment of high-risk endometrial malignancies.
Wong E; D'Souza DP; Chen JZ; Lock M; Rodrigues G; Coad T; Trenka K; Mulligan M; Bauman GS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):830-41. PubMed ID: 15708263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
Widesott L; Pierelli A; Fiorino C; Lomax AJ; Amichetti M; Cozzarini C; Soukup M; Schneider R; Hug E; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.
Chan P; Yeo I; Perkins G; Fyles A; Milosevic M
Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():13. PubMed ID: 16722546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of three different involved nodal irradiation techniques for stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and three-dimensional proton radiotherapy.
Chera BS; Rodriguez C; Morris CG; Louis D; Yeung D; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1173-80. PubMed ID: 19386423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical toxicities and dosimetric parameters after whole-pelvis versus prostate-only intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Deville C; Both S; Hwang WT; Tochner Z; Vapiwala N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):763-72. PubMed ID: 20171807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy after hysterectomy: comparison with conventional treatment and sensitivity of the normal-tissue-sparing effect to margin size.
Ahamad A; D'Souza W; Salehpour M; Iyer R; Tucker SL; Jhingran A; Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 15990017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression.
van de Bunt L; van der Heide UA; Ketelaars M; de Kort GA; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 15978745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A treatment planning and acute toxicity comparison of two pelvic nodal volume delineation techniques and delivery comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypofractionated high-risk prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Myrehaug S; Chan G; Craig T; Weinberg V; Cheng C; Roach M; Cheung P; Sahgal A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):e657-62. PubMed ID: 22245189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric study of pelvic proton radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Chera BS; Vargas C; Morris CG; Louis D; Flampouri S; Yeung D; Duvvuri S; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):994-1002. PubMed ID: 19619961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
