These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22179074)

  • 1. An Australian approach to the policy translation of deliberated citizen perspectives on biobanking.
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Potts A; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 22179074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice?
    Molster C; Maxwell S; Youngs L; Kyne G; Hope F; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Health Expect; 2013 Jun; 16(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 21645188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks.
    MacLean S; Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 20977185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informing public health policy through deliberative public engagement: perceived impact on participants and citizen-government relations.
    Molster C; Potts A; McNamara B; Youngs L; Maxwell S; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2013 Sep; 17(9):713-8. PubMed ID: 23862565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Citizens' Perspectives on Disinvestment from Publicly Funded Pathology Tests: A Deliberative Forum.
    Street JM; Callaghan P; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Hiller JE
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 26686790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.
    Bentley C; Peacock S; Abelson J; Burgess MM; Demers-Payette O; Longstaff H; Tripp L; Lavis JN; Wilson MG
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Feb; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 30732616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: five lessons from British Columbia.
    Walmsley H
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):452-68. PubMed ID: 20977183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Hawkins AK; Burgess MM
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Nov; 75(9):1604-11. PubMed ID: 22867865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM
    Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
    De Vries RG; Ryan KA; Gordon L; Krenz CD; Tomlinson T; Jewell S; Kim SYH
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Nov; 29(13):1942-1953. PubMed ID: 30095038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constructing populations in biobanking.
    Tupasela A; Snell K; Cañada JA
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2015; 11():5. PubMed ID: 26194269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making "ethical safe space" in the translation of contested knowledge: the role of community debate in defining end-of-life decision ethics.
    Kaufert J; Schwartz K; Wiebe R; Derksen J; Lutfiyya ZM; Richert D
    Palliat Support Care; 2013 Apr; 11(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 23259991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa.
    Staunton C; Tindana P; Hendricks M; Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):13. PubMed ID: 29482536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical Legal and Social Issues of Biobanking: Past, Present, and Future.
    Bledsoe MJ
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2017 Apr; 15(2):142-147. PubMed ID: 28375760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Dutch Citizen Forum on Public Reimbursement of Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Opinion Change.
    Jansen M; Baltussen R; Bijlmakers L; Tummers M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Feb; 11(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 32610763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.
    Street J; Duszynski K; Krawczyk S; Braunack-Mayer A
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 May; 109():1-9. PubMed ID: 24657639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Science and deliberation].
    Ravazzi S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.