These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2217915)
1. Quantitative factors in chemical carcinogenesis: variation in carcinogenic potency. Krewski D; Szyszkowicz M; Rosenkranz H Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1990 Aug; 12(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 2217915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC Working Paper 1/2. A multi-factor ranking scheme for comparing the carcinogenic activity of chemicals. Nesnow S Mutat Res; 1990 Sep; 239(2):83-115. PubMed ID: 2385240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996. Gold LS; Manley NB; Slone TH; Rohrbach L Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Aug; 107 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):527-600. PubMed ID: 10421768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans. Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity profiles of carcinogenicity data: application in hazard identification and risk assessment. Jackson MA; Stack HF; Waters MD Mutat Res; 1997 Nov; 394(1-3):113-24. PubMed ID: 9434850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Carcinogenic Potency Database: analyses of 4000 chronic animal cancer experiments published in the general literature and by the U.S. National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program. Gold LS; Slone TH; Manley NB; Garfinkel GB; Hudes ES; Rohrbach L; Ames BN Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():11-5. PubMed ID: 1820251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sixth plot of the carcinogenic potency database: results of animal bioassays published in the General Literature 1989 to 1990 and by the National Toxicology Program 1990 to 1993. Gold LS; Manley NB; Slone TH; Garfinkel GB; Ames BN; Rohrbach L; Stern BR; Chow K Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Nov; 103 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):3-122. PubMed ID: 8741772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of 'genotoxic' and 'non-genotoxic' alerts for cancer in mice: the carcinogenic potency database. Cunningham AR; Rosenkranz HS; Zhang YP; Klopman G Mutat Res; 1998 Feb; 398(1-2):1-17. PubMed ID: 9626960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal. O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment. Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Principles underlying dose selection for, and extrapolation from, the carcinogen bioassay: dose influences mechanism. Counts JL; Goodman JI Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Jun; 21(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 7480895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food. Pratt I; Barlow S; Kleiner J; Larsen JC Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19442758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency. Wang NC; Venkatapathy R; Bruce RM; Moudgal C Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Mar; 59(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 20951756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Summary of carcinogenic potency and positivity for 492 rodent carcinogens in the carcinogenic potency database. Gold LS; Slone TH; Bernstein L Environ Health Perspect; 1989 Feb; 79():259-72. PubMed ID: 2707207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens? Gaylor DW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database. Gold LS; Slone TH J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific analysis of the proposed uses of the T25 dose descriptor in chemical carcinogen regulation. Roberts RA; Crump KS; Lutz WK; Wiegand HJ; Williams GM; Harrison PT; Purchase IF Arch Toxicol; 2001 Nov; 75(9):507-12. PubMed ID: 11760810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens. Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved in silico prediction of carcinogenic potency (TD50) and the risk specific dose (RSD) adjusted Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for genotoxic chemicals and pharmaceutical impurities. Contrera JF Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 20933038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]