These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22179345)
1. Chlorhexidine-impregnated intravascular catheter sponge dressings: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Rupp ME Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):296-8. PubMed ID: 22179345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults in the Dressing Study. Schwebel C; Lucet JC; Vesin A; Arrault X; Calvino-Gunther S; Bouadma L; Timsit JF Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21926570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. Timsit JF; Schwebel C; Bouadma L; Geffroy A; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Pease S; Herault MC; Haouache H; Calvino-Gunther S; Gestin B; Armand-Lefevre L; Leflon V; Chaplain C; Benali A; Francais A; Adrie C; Zahar JR; Thuong M; Arrault X; Croize J; Lucet JC; JAMA; 2009 Mar; 301(12):1231-41. PubMed ID: 19318651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections. Roush K Am J Nurs; 2009 Nov; 109(11):65. PubMed ID: 19858861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: the role of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressings. Loftus MJ; Florescu CJ; Stuart RL Med J Aust; 2014 Apr; 200(6):317-8. PubMed ID: 24702084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge versus chlorhexidine gel dressing for short-term intravascular catheters: which one is better? Buetti N; Ruckly S; Schwebel C; Mimoz O; Souweine B; Lucet JC; Timsit JF Crit Care; 2020 Jul; 24(1):458. PubMed ID: 32703235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 3: paediatric care. Whitton J Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S22. PubMed ID: 25373255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Review: chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings reduce risk of colonisation of central venous catheters and risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Lorente L Evid Based Nurs; 2015 Jul; 18(3):91. PubMed ID: 25358484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine dressing and highly adhesive dressing for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults. Timsit JF; Mimoz O; Mourvillier B; Souweine B; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Alfandari S; Plantefeve G; Bronchard R; Troche G; Gauzit R; Antona M; Canet E; Bohe J; Lepape A; Vesin A; Arrault X; Schwebel C; Adrie C; Zahar JR; Ruckly S; Tournegros C; Lucet JC Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2012 Dec; 186(12):1272-8. PubMed ID: 23043083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic impact of use of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing for prevention of central line-associated infections in the United States. Ye X; Rupnow M; Bastide P; Lafuma A; Ovington L; Jarvis WR Am J Infect Control; 2011 Oct; 39(8):647-654. PubMed ID: 21641681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical experiences of using Biopatch: a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated sponge dressing. Case study 2: paediatric intensive care. Franklin N Br J Nurs; 2014; 23(14 Suppl):S21. PubMed ID: 25373254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial. Ruschulte H; Franke M; Gastmeier P; Zenz S; Mahr KH; Buchholz S; Hertenstein B; Hecker H; Piepenbrock S Ann Hematol; 2009 Mar; 88(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18679683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and prevention of catheter-related infections. Lv YG; Dong HL; Wang L JAMA; 2009 Jul; 302(4):379; author reply 380. PubMed ID: 19622811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Arvaniti K; Lathyris D; Clouva-Molyvdas P; Haidich AB; Mouloudi E; Synnefaki E; Koulourida V; Georgopoulos D; Gerogianni N; Nakos G; Matamis D; Crit Care Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):420-9. PubMed ID: 21926583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost effectiveness of dressing in the prevention of catheter-related infection in critically ill patients. Pedrolo E; Danski MTR; Wiens A; Boostel R J Infect Dev Ctries; 2018 Oct; 12(10):871-877. PubMed ID: 32004156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing: an efficient weapon against catheter-related bloodstream infection?*. Mahjoub Y; Dupont H Crit Care Med; 2014 Jul; 42(7):1742-3. PubMed ID: 24933057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing reduce the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in all vascular access? Lorente L Crit Care Med; 2015 Feb; 43(2):e50-1. PubMed ID: 25599496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]