These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22179446)

  • 1. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks.
    Storz P; Buess GF; Kunert W; Kirschniak A
    Surg Endosc; 2012 May; 26(5):1454-60. PubMed ID: 22179446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks.
    Harada H; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4228-4234. PubMed ID: 29603005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
    Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model.
    Schoenthaler M; Schnell D; Wilhelm K; Schlager D; Adams F; Hein S; Wetterauer U; Miernik A
    World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26242728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills.
    Smith R; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Jun; 26(6):1522-7. PubMed ID: 22234585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional (3D) simulation versus two-dimensional (2D) enhances surgical skills acquisition in standardised laparoscopic tasks: a before and after study.
    Ashraf A; Collins D; Whelan M; O'Sullivan R; Balfe P
    Int J Surg; 2015 Feb; 14():12-6. PubMed ID: 25560749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.
    Spille J; Wenners A; von Hehn U; Maass N; Pecks U; Mettler L; Alkatout I
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(5):867-877. PubMed ID: 28215494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
    Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2883-2887. PubMed ID: 33112544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.
    Wilhelm D; Reiser S; Kohn N; Witte M; Leiner U; Mühlbach L; Ruschin D; Reiner W; Feussner H
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2387-97. PubMed ID: 24651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.
    Zwimpfer TA; Wismer C; Fellmann-Fischer B; Geiger J; Schötzau A; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V
    Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 34699034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning curves, potential and speed in training of laparoscopic skills: a randomised comparative study in a box trainer.
    Kunert W; Storz P; Dietz N; Axt S; Falch C; Kirschniak A; Wilhelm P
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3303-3312. PubMed ID: 32642847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional laparoscopy: a step toward advanced surgical navigation.
    Buchs NC; Volonte F; Pugin F; Toso C; Morel P
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Feb; 27(2):692-3. PubMed ID: 22806536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery.
    Arain NA; Cadeddu JA; Best SL; Roshek T; Chang V; Hogg DC; Bergs R; Fernandez R; Webb EM; Scott DJ
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1170-80. PubMed ID: 22044976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A computerized assessment to compare the impact of standard, stereoscopic, and high-definition laparoscopic monitor displays on surgical technique.
    Feng C; Rozenblit JW; Hamilton AJ
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Nov; 24(11):2743-8. PubMed ID: 20361211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
    Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
    Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study.
    Bhattacharjee HK; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Agarwal H; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5328-5337. PubMed ID: 32959182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The learning effect of using stereoscopic vision in the early phase of laparoscopic surgical training for novices.
    Harada H; Kanaji S; Nishi M; Otake Y; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Sato Y; Kakeji Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):582-588. PubMed ID: 28643059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance.
    Lusch A; Bucur PL; Menhadji AD; Okhunov Z; Liss MA; Perez-Lanzac A; McDougall EM; Landman J
    J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 24059674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
    Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
    Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A laparoscopic study investigating 3D vs 2D imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model with experts, non-experts, and students.
    Zwimpfer TA; Lacher D; Fellmann-Fischer B; Mueller M
    BMC Surg; 2020 Nov; 20(1):276. PubMed ID: 33167972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.