These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22179651)

  • 1. An integrated approach for urban water quality assessment.
    Beenen AS; Langeveld JG; Liefting HJ; Aalderink RH; Velthorst H
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(7):1519-26. PubMed ID: 22179651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emission standards versus immission standards for assessing the impact of urban drainage on ephemeral receiving water bodies.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1617-29. PubMed ID: 20351441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the integrated urban water quality model complexity through identifiability analysis.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 20732705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 19819524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Storm water management in an urban catchment: effects of source control and real-time management of sewer systems on receiving water quality.
    Frehmann T; Nafo I; Niemann A; Geiger WF
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):19-26. PubMed ID: 12380970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of partially separate sewer systems and impacts on receiving waters.
    Ferreira FM; Matos JS; Rodrigues AC; do Monte HM
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 11905442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21076216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of real time control of sewer systems on treatment plant performance and receiving water quality.
    Frehmann T; Niemann A; Ustohal P; Geiger WF
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11902474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrated modelling concept for immission-based management of sewer system, wastewater treatment plant and river.
    Erbe V; Schütze M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):95-103. PubMed ID: 16248185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urban diffuse sources of faecal indicators.
    O'Keefe B; D'Arcy BJ; Davidson J; Barbarito B; Clelland B
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):183-90. PubMed ID: 15850189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urban water quality modelling: a parsimonious holistic approach for a complex real case study.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):521-36. PubMed ID: 20107280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental response to sewage treatment strategies: Hong Kong's experience in long term water quality monitoring.
    Xu J; Lee JH; Yin K; Liu H; Harrison PJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Nov; 62(11):2275-87. PubMed ID: 21871638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal variations of surface water quality in urban, suburban and rural areas during rapid urbanization in Shanghai, China.
    Wang J; Da L; Song K; Li BL
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Mar; 152(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 17681654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An impact assessment methodology for urban surface runoff quality following best practice treatment.
    Ellis JB; Revitt DM; Lundy L
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():172-9. PubMed ID: 22227301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling the catchment-scale environmental impacts of wastewater treatment in an urban sewage system for CO₂ emission assessment.
    Mouri G; Oki T
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(4):972-84. PubMed ID: 20729603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated risk assessment and screening analysis of drinking water safety of a conventional water supply system.
    Sun F; Chen J; Tong Q; Zeng S
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):47-56. PubMed ID: 17898443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa Bay watershed.
    Xian G; Crane M; Su J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Dec; 85(4):965-76. PubMed ID: 17208348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of pollution loads from CSOs into surface water bodies by means of online techniques.
    Gruber G; Winkler S; Pressl A
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(11):73-80. PubMed ID: 15685982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of new developments on river water quality from an integrated system modelling perspective.
    Fu G; Butler D; Khu ST
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(4):1257-67. PubMed ID: 19036407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining multimedia models with integrated urban water system models for micropollutants.
    De Keyser W; Gevaert V; Verdonck F; Nopens I; De Baets B; Vanrolleghem PA; Mikkelsen PS; Benedetti L
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(7):1614-22. PubMed ID: 20935380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.