145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22179945)
1. Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter.
Lee JB; Chang SG; Kim SY; Lee YS; Ryu JK; Choi JY; Kim KS; Park JS
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct; 28(7):1627-34. PubMed ID: 22179945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for functional assessment of coronary lesions.
Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Sugimoto K; Takahara M; Kobayashi Y
J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):280-286. PubMed ID: 27293021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS).
Schuurbiers JC; Lopez NG; Ligthart J; Gijsen FJ; Dijkstra J; Serruys PW; Van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Apr; 73(5):620-6. PubMed ID: 19309696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
Spoon DB; Rubinshtein R; Psaltis PJ; Sandhu GS; Lennon R; Rihal CS; Lerman A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.
Marwan M; Pflederer T; Schepis T; Seltmann M; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21245696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
Kan J; Gao X; Sandeep KG; Xu H; Zhao Y; Chen S; Chen F
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
Zasada W; Slezak M; Pociask E; Malinowski KP; Proniewska K; Buszman P; Milewski K; Granada JF; Kaluza GL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 35(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 30796556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of coronary atheroma by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound and angiography.
Ugolini P; Pressacco J; Lespérance J; Berry C; L'Allier PL; Ibrahim R; Grégoire J; Ouellet R; Heinonen T; Levesque S; Guertin MC; Tardif JC
Can J Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 25(11):641-7. PubMed ID: 19898696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
Muramatsu T; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Nakatani S; Girasis C; Campos CM; Morel MA; Jonker H; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; García-García HM; Leon MB; Serruys PW; Onuma Y;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective validation of standardized, 3-dimensional, quantitative coronary computed tomographic plaque measurements using radiofrequency backscatter intravascular ultrasound as reference standard in intermediate coronary arterial lesions: results from the ATLANTA (assessment of tissue characteristics, lesion morphology, and hemodynamics by angiography with fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology, and noninvasive computed tomography in atherosclerotic plaques) I study.
Voros S; Rinehart S; Qian Z; Vazquez G; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Taylor K; Ballard W; Karmpaliotis D; Kalynych A; Brown C
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Feb; 4(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 21349459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
Grundeken MJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kumsars I; Lesiak M; Kayaert P; Dens J; Stella PR; de Winter RJ; Laak LL; Généreux P; Kaplan AV; Leon MB; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):E53-E63. PubMed ID: 27083384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.
Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Huang Z; Reiber JH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21264684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparative study of target vessel assessments by three- and two-dimensional quantitative coronary X-ray angiography and visual estimation].
Hao PY; Chen AH; Song XD; Wei XL; Zhou SS; He F; Tu SX
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Feb; 31(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21354924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiographic derived endothelial shear stress: a new predictor of atherosclerotic disease progression.
Bourantas CV; Ramasamy A; Karagiannis A; Sakellarios A; Zanchin T; Yamaji K; Ueki Y; Shen X; Fotiadis DI; Michalis LK; Mathur A; Serruys PW; Garcia-Garcia HM; Koskinas K; Torii R; Windecker S; Räber L
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 30020435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments.
Gradaus R; Mathies K; Breithardt G; Böcker D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jul; 68(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 16770813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
