These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22179945)

  • 21. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlation between dual-axis rotational coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in a coronary lesion assessment.
    Jin ZG; Zhang ZQ; Jing LM; Wei YJ; Zhang J; Luo JP; Yang SL; Ma DX; Liu Y; Han W; Yang Y; Liu HL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 27730313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease progression.
    Berry C; L'Allier PL; Grégoire J; Lespérance J; Levesque S; Ibrahim R; Tardif JC
    Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(14):1851-7. PubMed ID: 17389269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correlation between 3D-QCA based FFR and quantitative lumen assessment by IVUS for left main coronary artery stenoses.
    Tomaniak M; Masdjedi K; van Zandvoort LJ; Neleman T; Tovar Forero MN; Vermaire A; Kochman J; Kardys I; den Dekker W; Wilschut J; Diletti R; de Jaegere P; Van Mieghem NM; Zijlstra F; Daemen J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):E495-E501. PubMed ID: 32725862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions.
    Grundeken MJ; Collet C; Ishibashi Y; Généreux P; Muramatsu T; LaSalle L; Kaplan AV; Wykrzykowska JJ; Morel MA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Onuma Y; Leon MB; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound assessments on target lesion and reference vessel in patients with diabetes mellitus].
    Jin ZN; Lü SZ; Chen YD; Yuan F; Song XT; Wu XF; Zhang LJ; Ren F; Ge CJ; Wang GZ; Xu XW
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 37(8):721-4. PubMed ID: 20021925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A nonimaging catheter for measurement of coronary artery lumen area: a first in man pilot study.
    Hermiller J; Choy JS; Svendsen M; Bigelow B; Fouts AM; Hall J; Parr K; Ball M; Sinha A; Bhatt DL; Kassab GS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):202-10. PubMed ID: 20939042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study.
    van der Giessen AG; Schaap M; Gijsen FJ; Groen HC; van Walsum T; Mollet NR; Dijkstra J; van de Vosse FN; Niessen WJ; de Feyter PJ; van der Steen AF; Wentzel JJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 26(7):781-96. PubMed ID: 19946749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting functionally significant coronary lesions.
    Lee J; Seo KW; Yang HM; Lim HS; Choi BJ; Choi SY; Tahk SJ; Yoon MH
    Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2020 Oct; 10(5):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 33224749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of assessment of native coronary arteries by standard versus three-dimensional coronary angiography.
    Agostoni P; Biondi-Zoccai G; Van Langenhove G; Cornelis K; Vermeersch P; Convens C; Vassanelli C; Van Den Heuvel P; Van Den Branden F; Verheye S
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 102(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 18638585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anatomic features of the left main coronary artery and factors associated with its bifurcation angle: a 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic study.
    Rubinshtein R; Lerman A; Spoon DB; Rihal CS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 80(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 22121105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Quantitative Coronary Angiography Compared to Intravascular Ultrasound: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Moon IT; Kim SH; Chin JY; Park SH; Yoon CH; Youn TJ; Chae IH; Kang SH
    JMIR Cardio; 2023 Apr; 7():e45299. PubMed ID: 37099368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms.
    Tu S; Koning G; Jukema W; Reiber JH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 26(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 19763876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT: a head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Gauss S; Achenbach S; Pflederer T; Schuhbäck A; Daniel WG; Marwan M
    Heart; 2011 Jun; 97(12):991-7. PubMed ID: 21478387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions by multidetector row computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Rodríguez-Granillo GA; Rosales MA; Llauradó C; Ivanc TB; Rodríguez AE
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Jan; 6(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 21205604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantification of coronary stenosis by dual source computed tomography in patients: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound and invasive angiography.
    Feuchtner G; Loureiro R; Bezerra H; Rocha-Filho JA; Sarwar A; Pflederer T; Marwan M; Petranovic M; Raffel CO; Brady TB; Jang IK; Achenbach S; Cury RC
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 21227613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of coronary lumen reconstruction on the estimation of endothelial shear stress: in vivo comparison of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional fusion combining optical coherent tomography.
    Kweon J; Kang SJ; Kim YH; Lee JG; Han S; Ha H; Yang DH; Kang JW; Lim TH; Kwon O; Ahn JM; Lee PH; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1134-1141. PubMed ID: 29028985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye.
    Sen T; Kilit C; Astarcioglu MA; Asarcikli LD; Aksu T; Kafes H; Parspur A; Gozubuyuk G; Amasyali B
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018; 29(5):278-282. PubMed ID: 30395141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intravascular ultrasound and 3D angle measurements of coronary bifurcations.
    van der Waal EC; Mintz GS; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bui AB; Pehlivanova M; Girasis C; Serruys PW; van der Giessen WJ; Weissman NJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jun; 73(7):910-6. PubMed ID: 19301356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.