425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22180317)
1. Split-face randomized treatment of facial telangiectasia comparing pulsed dye laser and an intense pulsed light handpiece.
Tanghetti EA
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Feb; 44(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22180317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy of nonpurpuragenic pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.
Neuhaus IM; Zane LT; Tope WD
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):920-8. PubMed ID: 19397667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Split-face treatment of facial dyschromia: pulsed dye laser with a compression handpiece versus intense pulsed light.
Galeckas KJ; Collins M; Ross EV; Uebelhoer NS
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):672-80. PubMed ID: 18318731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intense pulsed light vs. long-pulsed dye laser treatment of telangiectasia after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized split-lesion trial of two different treatments.
Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jun; 160(6):1237-41. PubMed ID: 19309367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of facial telangiectasia using a dual-wavelength laser system (595 and 1,064 nm): a randomized controlled trial with blinded response evaluation.
Karsai S; Roos S; Raulin C
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):702-8. PubMed ID: 18318728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.
Kono T; Groff WF; Sakurai H; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Nov; 59(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 17992138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation.
Faurschou A; Togsverd-Bo K; Zachariae C; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Feb; 160(2):359-64. PubMed ID: 19120324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A newly modified 595-nm pulsed dye laser with compression handpiece for the treatment of photodamaged skin.
Kauvar AN; Rosen N; Khrom T
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Oct; 38(9):808-13. PubMed ID: 16998912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective analysis for facial telangiectasia treatment using pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light configured with different wavelength bands.
Gao L; Qu H; Gao N; Li K; Dang E; Tan W; Wang G
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Jan; 19(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 31638320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intense pulsed light versus advanced fluorescent technology pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a split-face pilot comparison.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 6(10):1024-8. PubMed ID: 17966180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Retrospective Study on Efficacy of Pulsed Dye Laser and Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Facial Telangiectasia.
Gao L; Gao N; Song W; Dang E; Yin R; Wang L; Wang G
J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Nov; 16(11):1112-1116. PubMed ID: 29141059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Purpura-free treatment of lentigines using a long-pulsed 595 nm pulsed dye laser with compression handpiece: a randomized, controlled study.
Pootongkam S; Asawanonda P
J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11 Suppl):s18-24. PubMed ID: 19916263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A split-face comparison study of pulsed 532-nm KTP laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial telangiectasias and diffuse telangiectatic facial erythema.
Uebelhoer NS; Bogle MA; Stewart B; Arndt KA; Dover JS
Dermatol Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 17430378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intense pulsed light vs. pulsed-dye laser in the treatment of facial acne: a randomized split-face trial.
Choi YS; Suh HS; Yoon MY; Min SU; Lee DH; Suh DH
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):773-80. PubMed ID: 20002654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double pass 595 nm pulsed dye laser at a 6 minute interval for the treatment of port-wine stains is not more effective than single pass.
Peters MA; van Drooge AM; Wolkerstorfer A; van Gemert MJ; van der Veen JP; Bos JD; Beek JF
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Mar; 44(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 22362420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IPL vs PDL in treatment of facial erythema: A split-face study.
Handler MZ; Bloom BS; Goldberg DJ
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 16(4):450-453. PubMed ID: 28752575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy and Safety of Intense Pulsed Light With a KTP/PDLlike Filter for the Treatment of Facial Telangiectasias.
Peterson JD; Friedmann DP; Abdo K; Cahana Z
J Drugs Dermatol; 2020 Sep; 19(9):844-850. PubMed ID: 33026752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of topical vitamin K oxide gel in the resolution of postprocedural purpura.
Cohen JL; Bhatia AC
J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11):1020-4. PubMed ID: 19894369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split-face comparison between single-band and dual-band pulsed light technology for treatment of photodamage.
Varughese N; Keller L; Goldberg DJ
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Aug; 18(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 27183026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
