These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22181988)

  • 1. Benchmark interaction energies for biologically relevant noncovalent complexes containing divalent sulfur.
    Mintz BJ; Parks JM
    J Phys Chem A; 2012 Jan; 116(3):1086-92. PubMed ID: 22181988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
    Hobza P
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ab initio calculations on halogen-bonded complexes and comparison with density functional methods.
    Lu YX; Zou JW; Fan JC; Zhao WN; Jiang YJ; Yu QS
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(5):725-32. PubMed ID: 18727160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximations to complete basis set-extrapolated, highly correlated non-covalent interaction energies.
    Mackie ID; DiLabio GA
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(13):134318. PubMed ID: 21992316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein-ligand interaction energies with dispersion corrected density functional theory and high-level wave function based methods.
    Antony J; Grimme S; Liakos DG; Neese F
    J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(41):11210-20. PubMed ID: 21842894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Basis set dependence of higher-order correlation effects in π-type interactions.
    Carrell EJ; Thorne CM; Tschumper GS
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Jan; 136(1):014103. PubMed ID: 22239765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. True stabilization energies for the optimal planar hydrogen-bonded and stacked structures of guanine...cytosine, adenine...thymine, and their 9- and 1-methyl derivatives: complete basis set calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) levels and comparison with experiment.
    Jurecka P; Hobza P
    J Am Chem Soc; 2003 Dec; 125(50):15608-13. PubMed ID: 14664608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basis set consistent revision of the S22 test set of noncovalent interaction energies.
    Takatani T; Hohenstein EG; Malagoli M; Marshall MS; Sherrill CD
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Apr; 132(14):144104. PubMed ID: 20405982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complete basis set limit of Ab initio binding energies and geometrical parameters for various typical types of complexes.
    Min SK; Lee EC; Lee HM; Kim DY; Kim D; Kim KS
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Jun; 29(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 18074343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ab initio study of hydrogen-bond formation between aliphatic and phenolic hydroxy groups and selected amino acid side chains.
    Nagy PI; Erhardt PW
    J Phys Chem A; 2008 May; 112(18):4342-54. PubMed ID: 18373368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Density functional theory augmented with an empirical dispersion term. Interaction energies and geometries of 80 noncovalent complexes compared with ab initio quantum mechanics calculations.
    Jurecka P; Cerný J; Hobza P; Salahub DR
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jan; 28(2):555-69. PubMed ID: 17186489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in structure, energy, and spectrum between neutral, protonated, and deprotonated phenol dimers: comparison of various density functionals with ab initio theory.
    Kołaski M; Kumar A; Singh NJ; Kim KS
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Jan; 13(3):991-1001. PubMed ID: 21063580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Density-functional approaches to noncovalent interactions: a comparison of dispersion corrections (DFT-D), exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) theory, and specialized functionals.
    Burns LA; Vázquez-Mayagoitia A; Sumpter BG; Sherrill CD
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(8):084107. PubMed ID: 21361527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Isomers of the uracil dimer: an ab initio benchmark study.
    Frey JA; Müller A; Losada M; Leutwyler S
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Apr; 111(13):3534-42. PubMed ID: 17388514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of weak intermolecular interactions across QM/MM noncovalent boundaries.
    Kumbhar S; Fischer FD; Waller MP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 22185219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of conventional and dispersion-corrected density-functional theory methods for hydrogen bonding interaction energies.
    DiLabio GA; Johnson ER; Otero-de-la-Roza A
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Aug; 15(31):12821-8. PubMed ID: 23803877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correction to DFT interaction energies by an empirical dispersion term valid for a range of intermolecular distances.
    Deligkaris C; Rodriguez JH
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2012 Mar; 14(10):3414-24. PubMed ID: 22297728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New accurate benchmark energies for large water clusters: DFT is better than expected.
    Anacker T; Friedrich J
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Mar; 35(8):634-43. PubMed ID: 24482156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate description of argon and water adsorption on surfaces of graphene-based carbon allotropes.
    Kysilka J; Rubeš M; Grajciar L; Nachtigall P; Bludský O
    J Phys Chem A; 2011 Oct; 115(41):11387-93. PubMed ID: 21809813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Highly accurate CCSD(T) and DFT-SAPT stabilization energies of H-bonded and stacked structures of the uracil dimer.
    Pitonák M; Riley KE; Neogrády P; Hobza P
    Chemphyschem; 2008 Aug; 9(11):1636-44. PubMed ID: 18574830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.