93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22182517)
21. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go?
Husarik DB; Marin D; Samei E; Richard S; Chen B; Jaffe TA; Bashir MR; Nelson RC
Invest Radiol; 2012 Aug; 47(8):468-74. PubMed ID: 22717881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable?
Buerke B; Allkemper T; Kugel H; Bremer C; Evers S; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Tombach B
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18692751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach.
Miéville FA; Gudinchet F; Brunelle F; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 22217444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT.
Paul J; Schell B; Kerl JM; Maentele W; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e128-32. PubMed ID: 21640536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relationship between size-specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Hanaoka S; Matsubara K; Takata T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 19(4):246-251. PubMed ID: 29729075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Feasibility of Contrast-to-Noise Ratio on Measurements to Evaluate CT Image Quality in Terms of Low-Contrast Detailed Detectability.
Alsleem HA; Almohiy HM
Med Sci (Basel); 2020 Jul; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 32640553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimization of kilovoltage and tube current-exposure time product based on abdominal circumference: an oval phantom study for pediatric abdominal CT.
Dong F; Davros W; Pozzuto J; Reid J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 22915410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study.
Feuchtner GM; Jodocy D; Klauser A; Haberfellner B; Aglan I; Spoeck A; Hiehs S; Soegner P; Jaschke W
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 19671491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose reduction and image quality assessment in MDCT using AEC (D-DOM & Z-DOM) and in-plane bismuth shielding.
Lee K; Lee W; Lee J; Lee B; Oh G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Sep; 141(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 20511402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography for detection of various anatomic structures--effect on contrast enhancement, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality.
Paul J; Bauer RW; Maentele W; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):612-9. PubMed ID: 21376494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Effects of differences in head holder on image quality and radiation dose in head CT].
Yokomachi K; Nishimaru E; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Ishifuro M; Funama Y; Awai K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Oct; 70(10):1166-72. PubMed ID: 25327427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of activity outside the field of view on image quality for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner.
Matheoud R; Secco C; Della Monica P; Leva L; Sacchetti G; Inglese E; Brambilla M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5861-72. PubMed ID: 19759405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Proposal of a New Index Based on Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Low-contrast Detectability in Computed Tomographic Imaging].
Hashimoto J; Abe S; Ishimori Y; Monma M; Tsumuraya A; Miyauchi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(7):537-547. PubMed ID: 28724865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-dose computed tomography scans with automatic exposure control for patients of different ages undergoing cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT.
Yang CC; Yang BH; Tu CY; Wu TH; Liu SH
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):546-555. PubMed ID: 28430740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimization of low-contrast detectability in thin-collimated modern multidetector CT using an interactive sliding-thin-slab averaging algorithm.
von Falck C; Hartung A; Berndzen F; King B; Galanski M; Shin HO
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 18340246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
