1019 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22183200)
1. Comparison of the 95-degree angled blade plate and the locking condylar plate for the treatment of distal femoral fractures.
Vallier HA; Immler W
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Jun; 26(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 22183200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].
Krbec M; Motycka J; Lunácek L; Dousa P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Dec; 76(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 20067694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.
Vallier HA; Cureton BA; Patterson BM
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Dec; 25(12):736-41. PubMed ID: 21904230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New versus old: 95 degree angled blade plate versus distal femoral locking plate. A randomized clinical trial.
Patterson BM; Breslin MA; Wadenpfuhl LK; Vallier HA
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1563-1568. PubMed ID: 33279173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early Mechanical Failures of the Synthes Variable Angle Locking Distal Femur Plate.
Tank JC; Schneider PS; Davis E; Galpin M; Prasarn ML; Choo AM; Munz JW; Achor TS; Kellam JF; Gary JL
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Jan; 30(1):e7-e11. PubMed ID: 26849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation of distal femur fractures: an analysis of 335 cases.
Ricci WM; Streubel PN; Morshed S; Collinge CA; Nork SE; Gardner MJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Feb; 28(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 23760176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LCP Versus LISS in the Treatment of Open and Closed Distal Femur Fractures: Does it Make a Difference?
Southeast Fracture Consortium
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Jun; 30(6):e212-6. PubMed ID: 27218471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking-plate.
Arora R; Lutz M; Hennerbichler A; Krappinger D; Espen D; Gabl M
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 May; 21(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 17485996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are Locking Constructs in Distal Femoral Fractures Always Best? A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Less Invasive Stabilization System With the Minimally Invasive Dynamic Condylar Screw System.
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Jan; 30(1):e1-6. PubMed ID: 26429408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Treatment of femoral fracture on previous implants with minimally-invasive surgery and total weight-bearing: benefit of locking plate. Preliminary report].
Ehlinger M; Cognet JM; Simon P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Feb; 94(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 18342027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Catastrophic failure after open reduction internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with a novel locking plate implant.
Berkes MB; Little MT; Lazaro LE; Cymerman RM; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Oct; 26(10):e170-6. PubMed ID: 22430524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interprosthetic femoral fractures.
Mamczak CN; Gardner MJ; Bolhofner B; Borrelli J; Streubel PN; Ricci WM
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Dec; 24(12):740-4. PubMed ID: 21063218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open reduction and internal fixation of distal femoral nonunions: long-term functional outcomes following a treatment protocol.
Gardner MJ; Toro-Arbelaez JB; Harrison M; Hierholzer C; Lorich DG; Helfet DL
J Trauma; 2008 Feb; 64(2):434-8. PubMed ID: 18301211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Locked plating of periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty.
Hou Z; Bowen TR; Irgit K; Strohecker K; Matzko ME; Widmaier J; Smith WR
J Orthop Trauma; 2012 Jul; 26(7):427-32. PubMed ID: 22357080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early results with the new internal fixator systems LCP and LISS: a prospective study.
Hernanz González Y; Díaz Martín A; Jara Sánchez F; Resines Erasun C
Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Feb; 73(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 17441660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ninety-Five Degree Angled Blade Plate Fixation of High-Energy Unstable Proximal Femur Fractures Results in High Rates of Union and Minimal Complications.
Berkes MB; Schottel PC; Weldon M; Hansen DH; Achor TS
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Jul; 33(7):335-340. PubMed ID: 31094940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients.
Chakravarthy J; Bansal R; Cooper J
Injury; 2007 Jun; 38(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 17477923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting peri-implant fracture following locking plate for osteoporotic distal femur fractures.
Park KC; Lim SJ; Song YS; Hwang KT
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1201-1204. PubMed ID: 28935593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractures and refractures after femoral locking compression plate fixation in children and adolescents.
Becker T; Weigl D; Mercado E; Katz K; Bar-On E
J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(7):e40-6. PubMed ID: 22955543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
