These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Silicone breast implants. Can emerging medical, legal, and scientific concepts be reconciled? Snyder JW J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):133-220. PubMed ID: 9230567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical device recalls from 2004 to 2006: a focus on Class I recalls. Villarraga ML; Guerin HL; Lam T Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):581-92. PubMed ID: 17915400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Missouri health care providers be held liable under strict product liability law? Cole CH Mo Med; 1995 Sep; 92(9):581-3. PubMed ID: 7476832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Correction. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(242):66179. PubMed ID: 10179302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Jarcho DG Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Class actions in breast implant litigation. Peerless MJ; Eizenga MA Health Law Can; 1996 Feb; 16(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 10173416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Implants with flaws: disclosure and delay. Meier B N Y Times Web; 2005 Jun; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 15966120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Lohr decision: FDA perspective and position. Porter MJ Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10346705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Neraas MB Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Withdrawal of proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(142):39789-90. PubMed ID: 10181516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. License to maim: federal pre-emption and the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Petrella ME Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):349-89. PubMed ID: 10178392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal overprotection. Friedman JH Med Health R I; 2004 Oct; 87(10):294. PubMed ID: 15559378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(239):65384-8. PubMed ID: 10176832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the new products liability Restatement on prescription products. Schwartz TM Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(3):399-413. PubMed ID: 10343009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Civil and criminal liability associated with food recalls. Packman JM Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(3):437-52. PubMed ID: 10346721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer-directed advertising of contraceptive drugs: the FDA, Depo-Provera, and product liability. Green W Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 10343019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pharmaceutical industry wins "round one" in protections against product liability claims. Gatty B Hosp Formul; 1995 Apr; 30(4):238, 237. PubMed ID: 10141868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]