162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22183532)
1. On the use of molecular dynamics receptor conformations for virtual screening.
Nichols SE; Baron R; McCammon JA
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():93-103. PubMed ID: 22183532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of molecular dynamics sampling on the performance of virtual screening against GPCRs.
Tarcsay A; Paragi G; Vass M; Jójárt B; Bogár F; Keserű GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):2990-9. PubMed ID: 24116387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive power of molecular dynamics receptor structures in virtual screening.
Nichols SE; Baron R; Ivetac A; McCammon JA
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1439-46. PubMed ID: 21534609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ensemble docking into multiple crystallographically derived protein structures: an evaluation based on the statistical analysis of enrichments.
Craig IR; Essex JW; Spiegel K
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):511-24. PubMed ID: 20222690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of high throughput virtual screening by combining shape-matching and docking methods.
Lee HS; Choi J; Kufareva I; Abagyan R; Filikov A; Yang Y; Yoon S
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 18302357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling and selection of flexible proteins for structure-based drug design: backbone and side chain movements in p38 MAPK.
Subramanian J; Sharma S; B-Rao C
ChemMedChem; 2008 Feb; 3(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 18081134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective structure-based virtual screening for full and partial agonists of the beta2 adrenergic receptor.
de Graaf C; Rognan D
J Med Chem; 2008 Aug; 51(16):4978-85. PubMed ID: 18680279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. G protein- and agonist-bound serotonin 5-HT2A receptor model activated by steered molecular dynamics simulations.
Isberg V; Balle T; Sander T; Jørgensen FS; Gloriam DE
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):315-25. PubMed ID: 21261291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing an ensemble docking-based virtual screening strategy for kinase targets by considering protein flexibility.
Tian S; Sun H; Pan P; Li D; Zhen X; Li Y; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2664-79. PubMed ID: 25233367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis.
Sperandio O; Mouawad L; Pinto E; Villoutreix BO; Perahia D; Miteva MA
Eur Biophys J; 2010 Aug; 39(9):1365-72. PubMed ID: 20237920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computational sampling of a cryptic drug binding site in a protein receptor: explicit solvent molecular dynamics and inhibitor docking to p38 MAP kinase.
Frembgen-Kesner T; Elcock AH
J Mol Biol; 2006 May; 359(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 16616932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient method for high-throughput virtual screening based on flexible docking: discovery of novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
Mizutani MY; Itai A
J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(20):4818-28. PubMed ID: 15369385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.
Yarnitzky T; Levit A; Niv MY
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 20443165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of ligand-based tautomer and protomer prediction on structure-based virtual screening.
Kalliokoski T; Salo HS; Lahtela-Kakkonen M; Poso A
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2742-8. PubMed ID: 19928753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collecting and assessing human lactate dehydrogenase-A conformations for structure-based virtual screening.
Buonfiglio R; Ferraro M; Falchi F; Cavalli A; Masetti M; Recanatini M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):2792-7. PubMed ID: 24138094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes.
Cavasotto CN; Kovacs JA; Abagyan RA
J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jul; 127(26):9632-40. PubMed ID: 15984891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
