112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22183807)
1. Outcomes after total hip replacement based on patients' baseline status: what results can be expected?
Quintana JM; Aguirre U; Barrio I; Orive M; Garcia S; Escobar A
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2012 Apr; 64(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 22183807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement.
Quintana JM; Escobar A; Arostegui I; Bilbao A; Azkarate J; Goenaga JI; Arenaza JC
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jan; 166(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 16432092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision trees for indication of total hip replacement on patients with osteoarthritis.
Quintana JM; Bilbao A; Escobar A; Azkarate J; Goenaga JI
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2009 Nov; 48(11):1402-9. PubMed ID: 19726567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Identification of cut-off values.
Escobar A; Gonzalez M; Quintana JM; Vrotsou K; Bilbao A; Herrera-Espiñeira C; Garcia-Perez L; Aizpuru F; Sarasqueta C
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Feb; 20(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 22155074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state.
Tubach F; Ravaud P; Baron G; Falissard B; Logeart I; Bellamy N; Bombardier C; Felson D; Hochberg M; van der Heijde D; Dougados M
Ann Rheum Dis; 2005 Jan; 64(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 15130902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient relevant outcomes after total hip replacement. A comparison between different surgical techniques.
Nilsdotter AK; Lohmander LS
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 Jun; 1():21. PubMed ID: 12816544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement.
Quintana JM; Escobar A; Bilbao A; Arostegui I; Lafuente I; Vidaurreta I
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Dec; 13(12):1076-83. PubMed ID: 16154777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of estimates of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacement.
MacKay C; Clements N; Wong R; Davis AM
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2019 Oct; 27(10):1408-1419. PubMed ID: 31096046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes.
Hamel MB; Toth M; Legedza A; Rosen MP
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 168(13):1430-40. PubMed ID: 18625924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty.
Haddad FS; Garbuz DS; Chambers GK; Jagpal TJ; Masri BA; Duncan CP
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jan; 16(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 11172276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Willingness to go through surgery again validated the WOMAC clinically important difference from THR/TKR surgery.
Chesworth BM; Mahomed NN; Bourne RB; Davis AM;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):907-18. PubMed ID: 18687289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.
Mahomed NN; Liang MH; Cook EF; Daltroy LH; Fortin PR; Fossel AH; Katz JN
J Rheumatol; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1273-9. PubMed ID: 12064846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-reported functional outcome after primary total hip replacement treated with two different periopera-tive regimes: a follow-up study involving 61 patients.
Petersen MK; Andersen NT; Søballe K
Acta Orthop; 2008 Apr; 79(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18473252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The impact of preoperative function and pain on early patient-centred outcome after total hip arthroplasty].
Kessler S; Mattes T; Cakir B; Reichel H; Käfer W
Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(5):563-7. PubMed ID: 17939064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities.
Angst F; Aeschlimann A; Michel BA; Stucki G
J Rheumatol; 2002 Jan; 29(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 11824949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients' outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score.
Garbuz DS; Xu M; Sayre EC
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):998-1004. PubMed ID: 17027542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement.
Biring GS; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Nov; 89(11):1446-51. PubMed ID: 17998179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders.
Escobar A; García Pérez L; Herrera-Espiñeira C; Aizpuru F; Sarasqueta C; Gonzalez Sáenz de Tejada M; Quintana JM; Bilbao A
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Dec; 21(12):2006-12. PubMed ID: 24095837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classifying health-related quality of life outcomes of total hip arthroplasty.
Xu M; Garbuz DS; Kuramoto L; Sobolev B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2005 Sep; 6():48. PubMed ID: 16144550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population.
Jones CA; Voaklander DC; Johnston DW; Suarez-Almazor ME
J Rheumatol; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1745-52. PubMed ID: 10914862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
