These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22184424)

  • 1. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: broiler production systems.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG; Wiseman J; Guy J; Kyriazakis I
    Poult Sci; 2012 Jan; 91(1):8-25. PubMed ID: 22184424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: egg production systems.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG; Wiseman J; Guy J; Kyriazakis I
    Poult Sci; 2012 Jan; 91(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 22184425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.
    Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3130-43. PubMed ID: 26115299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
    Leinonen I; Kyriazakis I
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2016 Aug; 75(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 26935025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of dietary protease on nitrogen emissions from broiler production: a holistic comparison using Life Cycle Assessment.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG
    J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Dec; 95(15):3041-6. PubMed ID: 25857285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of welfare-enhancing system changes on the environmental impacts of broiler and egg production.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG; Kyriazakis I
    Poult Sci; 2014 Feb; 93(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 24570446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential environmental benefits of prospective genetic changes in broiler traits.
    Leinonen I; Williams AG; Kyriazakis I
    Poult Sci; 2016 Feb; 95(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 26628347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Protease Addition and Replacement of Soybean Meal by Corn Gluten Meal on the Growth of Broilers and on the Environmental Performances of a Broiler Production System in Greece.
    Giannenas I; Bonos E; Anestis V; Filioussis G; Papanastasiou DK; Bartzanas T; Papaioannou N; Tzora A; Skoufos I
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169511. PubMed ID: 28046072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system.
    Bacenetti J; Bava L; Zucali M; Lovarelli D; Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Fiala M
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():450-459. PubMed ID: 26383852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?
    Meier MS; Stoessel F; Jungbluth N; Juraske R; Schader C; Stolze M
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Feb; 149():193-208. PubMed ID: 25463583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment.
    Kebreab E; Liedke A; Caro D; Deimling S; Binder M; Finkbeiner M
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jun; 94(6):2664-81. PubMed ID: 27285941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life-cycle assessment of the beef cattle production system for the northern great plains, USA.
    Lupo CD; Clay DE; Benning JL; Stone JJ
    J Environ Qual; 2013 Sep; 42(5):1386-94. PubMed ID: 24216416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment.
    van der Werf HM; Kanyarushoki C; Corson MS
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3643-52. PubMed ID: 19664872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
    Méda B; Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Ponchant P; Espagnol S; Wilfart A
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100024. PubMed ID: 33750548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced on 6 Mediterranean buffalo farms.
    Pirlo G; Carè S; Fantin V; Falconi F; Buttol P; Terzano GM; Masoni P; Pacelli C
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6583-93. PubMed ID: 25129494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing environmental pollution using animal feed enzymes.
    Graham H; Simmins PH; Sands J
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(2 Pt A):285-9. PubMed ID: 15296179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing energy state and environmental impacts in ostrich and chicken production systems.
    Ramedani Z; Alimohammadian L; Kheialipour K; Delpisheh P; Abbasi Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Sep; 26(27):28284-28293. PubMed ID: 31363980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds.
    Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Espagnol S; Laisse-Redoux S; Gaudré D; Méda B; Wilfart A
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 30378514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impacts of French and Brazilian broiler chicken production scenarios: an LCA approach.
    Prudêncio da Silva V; van der Werf HM; Soares SR; Corson MS
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 133():222-31. PubMed ID: 24388925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.