175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22184471)
1. Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries.
Rathore S; Tyndall D; Wright J; Everett E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 22184471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Extraoral Bitewings Compared to Intraoral Bitewings in Detection of Interproximal Caries.
Felemban OM; Loo CY; Ramesh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33893259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
Elsaltani MH; Farid MM; Eldin Ashmawy MS
J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Paksoy CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e63-9. PubMed ID: 20416522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence, intraoral radiography, and cone beam computed tomography for detection of natural caries under restorations.
Dayo AF; Amaechi BT; Noujeim M; Deahl ST; Gakunga P; Katkar R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 May; 129(5):539-548. PubMed ID: 31956069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries.
Kayipmaz S; Sezgin ÖS; Saricaoğlu ST; Çan G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 20934291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries.
Krzyżostaniak J; Kulczyk T; Czarnecka B; Surdacka A
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 25059712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates.
Zhang ZL; Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 20952219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CBCT and intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection in the presence of different dental restoration materials.
Mosavat F; Ahmadi E; Amirfarhangi S; Rafeie N
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 37353807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography volume registration in the detection of mandibular alveolar bone defects.
Green PT; Mol A; Moretti AJ; Tyndall DA; Kohltfarber HB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):176-185. PubMed ID: 30685391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a photostimulable storage phosphor digital system with or without the sharpen filter and cone beam CT for detecting approximal enamel subsurface demineralization.
Belém MD; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120313. PubMed ID: 23412461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An ex vivo comparative study of occlusal and proximal caries using terahertz and X-ray imaging.
Kamburoğlu K; Karagöz B; Altan H; Özen D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180250. PubMed ID: 30379560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
