These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22184471)

  • 21. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
    Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.
    Senel B; Kamburoglu K; Uçok O; Yüksel SP; Ozen T; Avsever H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):501-11. PubMed ID: 21062944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Detection accuracy of occlusal caries by cone-beam computed tomography images scanned with different parameters].
    Han GS; Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Feb; 44(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 22353904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries.
    Young SM; Lee JT; Hodges RJ; Chang TL; Elashoff DA; White SC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):445-51. PubMed ID: 19767514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions.
    Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors.
    Wenzel A; Hirsch E; Christensen J; Matzen LH; Scaf G; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):39458105. PubMed ID: 22842638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Nackaerts O; ; Willems G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e129-39. PubMed ID: 21889061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images.
    Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e24-7. PubMed ID: 20185260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Histological validation of cone-beam computed tomography versus laser fluorescence and conventional diagnostic methods for occlusal caries detection.
    Ozturk E; Sinanoglu A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Feb; 33(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
    Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
    Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film.
    Kambungton J; Janhom A; Prapayasatok S; Pongsiriwet S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Feb; 41(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 22301636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.
    Bagis N; Kolsuz ME; Kursun S; Orhan K
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 May; 15():64. PubMed ID: 26016804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
    Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities.
    Kamburoğlu K; Kurt H; Kolsuz E; Öztaş B; Tatar I; Çelik HH
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):804-13. PubMed ID: 21116675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of the Light-induced Fluorescent Intraoral Camera in Occlusal Caries Detection.
    Alzayyat NA; Hafez RM; Yassen AA; Ibrahim SH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):365-372. PubMed ID: 34267005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) an alternative to plain radiography in assessments of dental disease? A study of method agreement in a medically compromised patient population.
    Lindfors N; Ekestubbe A; Frisk F; Lund H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Jan; 28(2):127. PubMed ID: 38289447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) System: Comparison with Intraoral Periapical Radiography in Proximal Caries Detection.
    Valizadeh S; Tavakkoli MA; Karimi Vasigh H; Azizi Z; Zarrabian T
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22991626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.