These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22185083)

  • 1. The use of mouse and one- and two-finger input methods for searching a large, horizontal display.
    Hsu CC; Huang HG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):686-702. PubMed ID: 22185083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of proprioception and tactile information in haptic search.
    Overvliet KE; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18561891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of display size on visual attention.
    Chen IP; Liao CN; Yeh SH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):959-74. PubMed ID: 21853782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial coding of touch at the fingers: Insights from double simultaneous stimulation within and between hands.
    Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 20933059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of advertisement location and familiarity on selective attention.
    Jessen TL; Rodway P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 1):941-60. PubMed ID: 20681345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related differences in processing visual device and task characteristics when using technical devices.
    Oehl M; Sutter C
    Appl Ergon; 2015 May; 48():214-23. PubMed ID: 25683548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of learning for linear and differential video magnifiers.
    Lee FC; Chan AH
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1501-13. PubMed ID: 19941183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search?
    Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effects of synchronous and asynchronous multifinger coactivation on human tactile performance.
    Kalisch T; Tegenthoff M; Dinse HR
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 8():58. PubMed ID: 17663778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device.
    Akamatsu M; MacKenzie IS; Hasbroucq T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 7729406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Touch displays: the effects of palm rejection technology on productivity, comfort, biomechanics and positioning.
    Camilleri MJ; Malige A; Fujimoto J; Rempel DM
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(12):1850-62. PubMed ID: 24134774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's lateralization on a finger-localization task.
    Geraldson B; Hopkins WD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1259-64. PubMed ID: 9229445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Watching a cursor distorts haptically guided reproduction of mouse movement.
    Klatzky RL; Lederman SJ; Langseth S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Dec; 9(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 14664674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of hand orientation on bimanual finger coordination in an eight-finger tapping task.
    Kirsch W; Kunde W
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1399-408. PubMed ID: 23159443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personally-significant information affects performance only within the focus of attention: a direct manipulation of attention.
    Breska A; Israel M; Maoz K; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1754-67. PubMed ID: 21541809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.