78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22185492)
1. Closing the gates to consciousness: distractors activate a central inhibition process.
Niedeggen M; Michael L; Hesselmann G
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 24(6):1294-304. PubMed ID: 22185492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
Winther GN; Niedeggen M
Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.
Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M
Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The state of a central inhibition system predicts access to visual targets: An ERP study on distractor-induced blindness (DIB).
Niedeggen M; Busch NA; Winther GN
Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():308-18. PubMed ID: 25724342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ERPs predict the appearance of visual stimuli in a temporal selection task.
Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 16730675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiological evidence of multitasking impairment of attentional deployment reflects target-specific processing, not distractor inhibition.
Corriveau I; Fortier-Gauthier U; Pomerleau VJ; McDonald J; Dell'acqua R; Jolicoeur P
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Nov; 86(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 22732349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probing the prerequisites for motion blindness.
Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M; Blakemore C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 May; 16(4):584-97. PubMed ID: 15165349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distractor-induced deafness: The effect of multiple auditory distractors on conscious target processing.
Kern L; Niedeggen M
Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():181-194. PubMed ID: 33279811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM
Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frontal eye field stimulation modulates the balance of salience between target and distractors.
Walker R; Techawachirakul P; Haggard P
Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():54-63. PubMed ID: 19285965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness.
Hesselmann G; Niedeggen M; Sahraie A; Milders M
Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):1048-56. PubMed ID: 16309728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
McDonald JJ; Green JJ
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Positional priming of pop-out: a relational-encoding account.
Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 20462304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. I did it: unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature.
Gentsch A; Schütz-Bosbach S
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):3817-28. PubMed ID: 21452945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open and closed cortico-subcortical loops: A neuro-computational account of access to consciousness in the distractor-induced blindness paradigm.
Ebner C; Schroll H; Winther G; Niedeggen M; Hamker FH
Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():295-307. PubMed ID: 25802010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal dissociation between distractors and targets: the impact of residual distractor processing on target responses.
Kritikos A; McNeill J; Pavlis A
J Mot Behav; 2008 Jan; 40(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18316295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contingent aftereffects distinguish conscious and preconscious color processing.
Vul E; MacLeod DI
Nat Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 9(7):873-4. PubMed ID: 16767088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
