114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22186202)
1. [Efficacy of patient skin dose reduction by a compensating filter through of irradiation field overlaps on the area during percutaneous coronary intervention].
Yamasaki H; Nakahara M; Yamaguchi S; Yamamoto N; Miyagawa T; Hirose E; Takenaka T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(12):1565-73. PubMed ID: 22186202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overlap of radiation field and radiation field shape in cardiac catheterization.
Nakajima T; Take T; Sumi S; Ishida H; Nakazawa Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jan; 4(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 20820967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology.
Kuon E; Dahm JB; Empen K; Robinson DM; Reuter G; Wucherer M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 15464322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography.
Kočka V; Thériault-Lauzier P; Xiong TY; Ben-Shoshan J; Petr R; Laboš M; Buithieu J; Mousavi N; Pilgrim T; Praz F; Overtchouk P; Beaudry JP; Spaziano M; Pelletier JP; Martucci G; Dandona S; Rinfret S; Windecker S; Leipsic J; Piazza N
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(21):2560-2570. PubMed ID: 33153569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of radiation dose reduction due to real-time monitoring and visualization of peak skin dose during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Ichimoto E; Kadohira T; Nakayama T; De Gregorio J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):717-722. PubMed ID: 28557313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of MOSFET Dosimeter Angular Response Using a Spherical Phantom for Fluoroscopic Dosimetry.
Wang C; Hill K; Yoshizumi T
Health Phys; 2016 Jan; 110(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 26606064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Personal operator dose in invasive cardiology as a function of body height and tube angulation].
Kuon E; Empen K; Reuter G; Dahm JB
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):739-45. PubMed ID: 15122474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation exposure to patients and operators during diagnostic catheterization and coronary angioplasty.
Zorzetto M; Bernardi G; Morocutti G; Fontanelli A
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Apr; 40(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 9096931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.
Kuon E; Dahm JB; Robinson DM; Empen K; Günther M; Wucherer W
Z Kardiol; 2005 Oct; 94(10):663-73. PubMed ID: 16200481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. X-ray dose to the skin in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Miralbell R; Doriot PA; Nouet P; Rouzaud M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2000 Jul; 50(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 10878626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the use of a niobium filter for patient dose reduction in chest radiography.
Thierens H; Kunnen M; Van der Plaetsen A; Segaert O
Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):334-40. PubMed ID: 2025775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration.
Nicholson RA; Thornton A; Akpan M
Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):296-300. PubMed ID: 7735770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient's Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections.
Farajollahi A; Rahimi A; Khayati Shal E; Ghaffari S; Ghojazadeh M; Tajlil A; Aslanabadi N
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res; 2014; 6(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 25610557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient doses and dosimetric evaluations in interventional cardiology.
Bor D; Olğar T; Toklu T; Cağlan A; Onal E; Padovani R
Phys Med; 2009 Mar; 25(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 18440265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of entrance skin dose delivered by clinical angiographic c-arms using the real-time dosimeter: the MOSkin.
Thorpe NK; Cutajar D; Lian C; Pitney M; Friedman D; Perevertaylo V; Rosenfeld A
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Jun; 39(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 27098157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods to reduce patients' maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Koyama Y; Ochiai M; Asakura Y
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):792-8. PubMed ID: 18324699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of low rate fluoroscopy at reducing operator and patient radiation dose during transradial coronary angiography and interventions.
Abdelaal E; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Arsenault J; Rimac G; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Larose E; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Allende R; Ribeiro H; Costerousse O; Mongrain R; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 24746649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the target vessel on the location and area of maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Chida K; Fuda K; Kagaya Y; Saito H; Takai Y; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Zuguchi M
Acta Radiol; 2007 Oct; 48(8):846-50. PubMed ID: 17924214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy on reduction of radiation dose in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Holmes DR; Wondrow MA; Gray JE; Vetter RJ; Fellows JL; Julsrud PR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 15(1):159-62. PubMed ID: 2295727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reduction in radiation dose for intra-oral radiographs by the use of thin K-edge filters.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP
Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):524-8. PubMed ID: 2070183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
