BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22186758)

  • 21. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch.
    Grover M; Vaidyanathan AK; Veeravalli PT
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 23331716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mandibular implant-retained complete overdenture using retentive abutments: a case report.
    Saha S; Ray-Chaudhuri A
    Dent Update; 2009 Apr; 36(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 19480103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.
    Heydecke G; Boudrias P; Awad MA; De Albuquerque RF; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Feb; 14(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 12562375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review.
    Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 9714961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transition from failing dentition to complete-arch implant rehabilitation with a staged approach: a 3-year clinical report.
    Papaspyridakos P; Chronopoulos V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 24631159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
    Assad AS; Abd El-Dayem MA; Badawy MM
    Implant Dent; 2004 Dec; 13(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 15592001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture with magnets: a case report.
    Tan AS; Walmsley AD
    Dent Update; 2004 Mar; 31(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 15065374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment of the edentulous mandible.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Feb; 132(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 11217598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Seven-year follow-up results of TiUnite implants supporting mandibular overdentures: early versus delayed loading.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tozum TF; Fuhrmann DM; Tumer C
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e83-90. PubMed ID: 21745326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.
    Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI
    J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implant complications and failures: the complete overdenture.
    Watson CJ; Tinsley D; Sharma S
    Dent Update; 2001 Jun; 28(5):234-8, 240. PubMed ID: 11490634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal Bone Response Around Immediate- and Delayed-Loading Implants Supporting a Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Schincaglia GP; Rubin S; Thacker S; Dhingra A; Trombelli L; Ioannidou E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):448-58. PubMed ID: 27004292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the "all on four" immediate function protocol.
    Crespi R; Vinci R; Capparé P; Romanos GE; Gherlone E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 22442784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Treatment outcomes with implant-supported overdentures: clinical considerations.
    Mericske-Stern R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jan; 79(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9474544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A 2-year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C; Ozbek EN
    J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 17209784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture.
    Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 9237143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
    Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Use of implant-supported prostheses in edentulous mandibles among prosthodontists in Sweden.
    Ascher A; Carlsson GE; Kronström M
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):161-7. PubMed ID: 25771650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function.
    Rodriguez AM; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 11885168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.