These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22186862)

  • 1. Elastomeric impression materials: a comparison of accuracy of multiple pours.
    Kumar D; Madihalli AU; Reddy KR; Rastogi N; Pradeep NT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 22186862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly introduced elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study.
    Pandita A; Jain T; Yadav NS; Feroz SM; Pradeep ; Diwedi A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 23811657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials.
    Singer L; Habib SI; Shalaby HE; Saniour SH; Bourauel C
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):379. PubMed ID: 36064393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part I: Condensation silicones.
    Lacy AM; Bellman T; Fukui H; Jendresen MD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Feb; 45(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 7009840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
    Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D evaluation of the effect of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and stability of two elastomeric impression materials.
    Soganci G; Cinar D; Caglar A; Yagiz A
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):675-684. PubMed ID: 29848853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials.
    Pereira JR; Murata KY; Valle AL; Ghizoni JS; Shiratori FK
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 20877972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of dimensional precision of different silicone impression materials.
    Al-Zarea BK; Sughaireen MG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 May; 12(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 22186818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Study of Dimensional Stability and Detail Reproduction of Reformulated and Nonreformulated Elastomeric Impression Materials.
    Aivatzidou K; Kamalakidis SN; Emmanouil I; Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):345-350. PubMed ID: 32875682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials.
    Faria AC; Rodrigues RC; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 19148382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.