These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22187374)
1. Updates to policies and procedures related to potential scientific and academic misconduct in the journals of the American Diabetes Association. Kohler CS; Diabetes; 2012 Jan; 61(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22187374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cooperate to stop misconduct. Qualkenbush L Nature; 2018 May; 557(7707):637. PubMed ID: 29849159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Updates to policies and procedures related to potential scientific and academic misconduct in the journals of the American Diabetes Association. Kohler CS; Diabetes Care; 2012 Jan; 35(1):189-90. PubMed ID: 22187442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Misrepresenting the list of qualifications--a new form of scientific fraud?]. Vuorio E; Karjalainen S Duodecim; 2000; 116(11):1251-2. PubMed ID: 11989012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Researcher fails in legal bid to halt expression of concern by journal Diabetes. Dyer O BMJ; 2015 Feb; 350():h1112. PubMed ID: 25722185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retractions are part of science, but misconduct isn't - lessons from a superconductivity lab. Nature; 2024 Apr; 628(8009):689-690. PubMed ID: 38658690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct. Bosch X J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sanctions for authors of plagiarized Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases article. Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2011; 7(1):125. PubMed ID: 21255737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct? Wager E Anaesthesia; 2012 May; 67(5):462-466. PubMed ID: 22404337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why has COPE developed guidelines for cooperation between journals and research institutions? Wager E Med Arch; 2012; 66(4):220-1. PubMed ID: 22919873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific Academies: In the best company. Macilwain C Nature; 2010 Jun; 465(7301):1002-4. PubMed ID: 20577185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal agencies can do more to ensure correction of the literature when research misconduct is found. Parrish DM Account Res; 2018; 25(6):370-372. PubMed ID: 30064271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific societies as sentinels of responsible research conduct. Frankel MS Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 10964255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties. Soskolne CL J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan. Wada M Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]