579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22188275)
1. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos.
Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive comparison of iTRAQ and label-free LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches using two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains of interest for biofuels engineering.
Wang H; Alvarez S; Hicks LM
J Proteome Res; 2012 Jan; 11(1):487-501. PubMed ID: 22059437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of gas-phase fractionation and MS³ acquisition modes for relative protein quantification with isobaric tagging.
Dayon L; Sonderegger B; Kussmann M
J Proteome Res; 2012 Oct; 11(10):5081-9. PubMed ID: 22946824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of isobaric and isotopic labeling in quantitative plant proteomics.
Nogueira FC; Palmisano G; Schwämmle V; Campos FA; Larsen MR; Domont GB; Roepstorff P
J Proteome Res; 2012 May; 11(5):3046-52. PubMed ID: 22452248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative proteome analysis using isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL).
Arntzen MO; Koehler CJ; Treumann A; Thiede B
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():65-76. PubMed ID: 21604116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining low- and high-energy tandem mass spectra for optimized peptide quantification with isobaric tags.
Dayon L; Pasquarello C; Hoogland C; Sanchez JC; Scherl A
J Proteomics; 2010 Feb; 73(4):769-77. PubMed ID: 19903544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gaining efficiency by parallel quantification and identification of iTRAQ-labeled peptides using HCD and decision tree guided CID/ETD on an LTQ Orbitrap.
Mischerikow N; van Nierop P; Li KW; Bernstein HG; Smit AB; Heck AJ; Altelaar AF
Analyst; 2010 Oct; 135(10):2643-52. PubMed ID: 20714520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IsobariQ: software for isobaric quantitative proteomics using IPTL, iTRAQ, and TMT.
Arntzen MØ; Koehler CJ; Barsnes H; Berven FS; Treumann A; Thiede B
J Proteome Res; 2011 Feb; 10(2):913-20. PubMed ID: 21067241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An exclusion list based label-free proteome quantification approach using an LTQ Orbitrap.
Muntel J; Hecker M; Becher D
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 Mar; 26(6):701-9. PubMed ID: 22328225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of two isobaric labeling tags, DiART and iTRAQ.
Chen Z; Wang Q; Lin L; Tang Q; Edwards JL; Li S; Liu S
Anal Chem; 2012 Mar; 84(6):2908-15. PubMed ID: 22404494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sulfur-36S stable isotope labeling of amino acids for quantification (SULAQ).
Jehmlich N; Kopinke FD; Lenhard S; Vogt C; Herbst FA; Seifert J; Lissner U; Völker U; Schmidt F; von Bergen M
Proteomics; 2012 Jan; 12(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 22106033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benchmarking stable isotope labeling based quantitative proteomics.
Altelaar AF; Frese CK; Preisinger C; Hennrich ML; Schram AW; Timmers HT; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
J Proteomics; 2013 Aug; 88():14-26. PubMed ID: 23085607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating Acquisition Performance on the Orbitrap Fusion When Using Tandem MS/MS/MS Scanning with Isobaric Tags.
Hughes CS; Spicer V; Krokhin OV; Morin GB
J Proteome Res; 2017 May; 16(5):1839-1846. PubMed ID: 28418257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High precision quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ on an LTQ Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometric method combining the benefits of all.
Köcher T; Pichler P; Schutzbier M; Stingl C; Kaul A; Teucher N; Hasenfuss G; Penninger JM; Mechtler K
J Proteome Res; 2009 Oct; 8(10):4743-52. PubMed ID: 19663507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating influence of cofragmentation on peptide quantification and identification in iTRAQ experiments by simulating multiplexed spectra.
Li H; Hwang KB; Mun DG; Kim H; Lee H; Lee SW; Paek E
J Proteome Res; 2014 Jul; 13(7):3488-97. PubMed ID: 24918111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring and managing ratio compression for accurate iTRAQ/TMT quantification.
Savitski MM; Mathieson T; Zinn N; Sweetman G; Doce C; Becher I; Pachl F; Kuster B; Bantscheff M
J Proteome Res; 2013 Aug; 12(8):3586-98. PubMed ID: 23768245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tandem mass tag protein labeling for top-down identification and quantification.
Hung CW; Tholey A
Anal Chem; 2012 Jan; 84(1):161-70. PubMed ID: 22103715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of stable-isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture and spectral counting for relative quantification of protein expression.
Collier TS; Randall SM; Sarkar P; Rao BM; Dean RA; Muddiman DC
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2011 Sep; 25(17):2524-32. PubMed ID: 21818813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of label-free and label-based strategies for proteome analysis of hepatoma cell lines.
Megger DA; Pott LL; Ahrens M; Padden J; Bracht T; Kuhlmann K; Eisenacher M; Meyer HE; Sitek B
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 May; 1844(5):967-76. PubMed ID: 23954498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of label and label-free techniques using shotgun proteomics for relative protein quantification.
Sjödin MO; Wetterhall M; Kultima K; Artemenko K
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2013 Jun; 928():83-92. PubMed ID: 23608324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
