These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. Bagesteiro LB; Sainburg RL J Neurophysiol; 2002 Nov; 88(5):2408-21. PubMed ID: 12424282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. Sainburg RL; Kalakanis D J Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 83(5):2661-75. PubMed ID: 10805666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic dominance varies with handedness: reduced interlimb asymmetries in left-handers. Przybyla A; Good DC; Sainburg RL Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 22113487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Handedness can be explained by a serial hybrid control scheme. Yadav V; Sainburg RL Neuroscience; 2014 Oct; 278():385-96. PubMed ID: 25173152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Sainburg RL Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(2):241-58. PubMed ID: 11807578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motor lateralization is characterized by a serial hybrid control scheme. Yadav V; Sainburg RL Neuroscience; 2011 Nov; 196():153-67. PubMed ID: 21889579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Beer RF; Dewald JP; Dawson ML; Rymer WZ Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(4):458-70. PubMed ID: 14968276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position. Duff SV; Sainburg RL Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 179(4):551-61. PubMed ID: 17171336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production. Wang W; Johnson T; Sainburg RL; Dounskaia N Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 216(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 22076406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate compensation for variations in self-generated Coriolis torques related to body dynamics and carried objects. Pigeon P; Dizio P; Lackner JR J Neurophysiol; 2013 Sep; 110(6):1370-84. PubMed ID: 23803330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field. Gentili R; Cahouet V; Papaxanthis C Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 17224242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. Wang J; Sainburg RL J Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 92(1):349-60. PubMed ID: 15028745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The leading joint hypothesis for spatial reaching arm motions. Ambike S; Schmiedeler JP Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 23229774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinematic strategies for upper arm-forearm coordination in three dimensions. Medendorp WP; Crawford JD; Henriques DY; Van Gisbergen JA; Gielen CC J Neurophysiol; 2000 Nov; 84(5):2302-16. PubMed ID: 11067974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]