1416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22188401)
1. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue.
Bürklein S; Flüch S; Schäfer E
Odontology; 2019 Jan; 107(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 29777391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical transportation in curved root canals instrumented by reciprocating file systems.
Barbieri N; Leonardi DP; Baechtold MS; Correr GM; Gabardo MC; Zielak JC; Baratto-Filho F
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Nov; 15():149. PubMed ID: 26593244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo.
Bürklein S; Jäger PG; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2017 Oct; 50(10):983-990. PubMed ID: 27809348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.
Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC
Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Liu Y; Chen M; Tang W; Liu C; Du M
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):649. PubMed ID: 36577985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Lohmann D
Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
