1476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22188401)
21. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of curved root canals preparation using reciprocating, continuous and an association of motions.
Hoppe CB; Böttcher DE; Justo AM; Só MV; Grecca FS
Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):462-468. PubMed ID: 26750106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
Azar MR; Mokhtare M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of larger apical preparations in the danger zone of lower molars prepared using the Mtwo and Reciproc systems.
Sant'Anna Júnior A; Cavenago BC; Ordinola-Zapata R; De-Deus G; Bramante CM; Duarte MA
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1855-9. PubMed ID: 25127935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Reciproc in Simulated Root Canals.
Maia Filho EM; Dos Reis Santos RM; Lima DM; da Silva Pereira SM; Soares JA; de Jesus Tavarez RR; Ferreira MC; Carvalho CN; Bandeca MC; Tonetto MR; Borges AH; de Castro Rizzi C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):902-906. PubMed ID: 27965498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Kamel WH; Kataia EM
J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper.
Sonntag D; Ott M; Kook K; Stachniss V
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17697248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Aktı A
Int Endod J; 2016 Jun; 49(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 26084620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals.
Martinho FC; Gomes AP; Fernandes AM; Ferreira NS; Endo MS; Freitas LF; Camões IC
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 24767554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shaping ability of the conventional nickel-titanium and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems: a comparative study using micro-computed tomography.
Hwang YH; Bae KS; Baek SH; Kum KY; Lee W; Shon WJ; Chang SW
J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1186-9. PubMed ID: 25069930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
