These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2218865)

  • 1. [Dose calculation for very small irregular electron beam fields. 1. Dose calculation for the central beam using a simple field zone method].
    Gutt VF; Kuphal K; Hodapp N
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Sep; 166(9):603-9. PubMed ID: 2218865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The dosage calculation of very small irregular electron irradiation fields. 2. The dosage distribution at the edge of the field].
    Gutt VF; Kuphal K
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1991 Aug; 167(8):472-6. PubMed ID: 1887363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of electron beam obliquity on lateral buildup ratio: a Monte Carlo dosimetry evaluation.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3965-77. PubMed ID: 17664588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Accuracy of distribution of the doses obtained with electron beams of irregular shape and in the presence of inhomogeneous structures].
    Andreucci L; Ghiso G; Riccardi I; Schenone A
    Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4 Suppl 1):33-6. PubMed ID: 2251415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of an add-on multileaf collimator for electron beam therapy.
    Gauer T; Sokoll J; Cremers F; Harmansa R; Luzzara M; Schmidt R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):1071-85. PubMed ID: 18263959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matching the dosimetry characteristics of a dual-field Stanford technique to a customized single-field Stanford technique for total skin electron therapy.
    Chen Z; Agostinelli AG; Wilson LD; Nath R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):872-85. PubMed ID: 15183491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
    Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dosimetry problems of radiotherapy with electron fields of small dimension or partially shielded].
    Begnozzi L; Arcangeli G; Giovinazzo G; Franceschelli L; Bianciardi L; Benassi M
    Radiol Med; 1990 Oct; 80(4 Suppl 1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2251416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical implementation of an empirical method for electron output factor determination.
    Johnson DA; Ahmad S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2010; 18(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 20714088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculation of electron beam depth-dose curves and output factors for arbitrary field shapes.
    Bruinvis IA; Mathol WA
    Radiother Oncol; 1988 Apr; 11(4):395-404. PubMed ID: 3131845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equations for the dose distributions of high-energy electrons.
    Ueda T
    Strahlentherapie; 1979 Oct; 155(10):709-13. PubMed ID: 115117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric verification of a 3-D electron pencil beam dose calculation algorithm.
    McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 8164578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple empirical formula for predicting range variation of central-axis parameters in small electron fields.
    Hwang IM; Chuang KS
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2001 Dec; 17(12):620-5. PubMed ID: 12168496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An enhanced sector integration model for output and dose distribution calculation of irregular concave shaped electron beams.
    Gajewski R
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2966-75. PubMed ID: 19673195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the computer in high-energy electron therapy.
    Poretti GG; Ionesco-Farca F
    Radiol Clin (Basel); 1978; 47(2):139-53. PubMed ID: 625554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic optimization of the double-scatterer system for electron beam field-flattening.
    Mandour MA; Harder D
    Strahlentherapie; 1978 May; 154(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 653762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Output factors for irregularly shaped electron fields.
    Kurup RG; Glasgow GP; Leybovich L
    Med Dosim; 1995; 20(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 7576087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for the assessment of the output of irregularly shaped electron fields.
    Jones D; Andre P; Washington JT; Hafermann MD
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Jan; 63(745):59-64. PubMed ID: 2106361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A way to spatial irradiation planning. III. Further information on the procedure for obtaining dose homogeneity in noncoplanar ray beams and its experimental verification].
    Sonntag A
    Strahlentherapie; 1976 Jan; 151(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 1258073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.