These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22189469)

  • 21. Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study.
    Hodge SE; Abreu PC; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 60(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 8981965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Model-free linkage analysis: performance under real-world conditions.
    Barmada MM; O'Connell JR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S498-503. PubMed ID: 11793726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lods, wrods, and mods: the interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models.
    Hodge SE; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 7813895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Calculation of multipoint likelihoods using flanking marker data: a simulation study.
    George AW; Mangin LA; Bartlett CW; Logue MW; Segre AM; Vieland VJ
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S44. PubMed ID: 16451655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MOD-score analysis with simple pedigrees: an overview of likelihood-based linkage methods.
    Strauch K
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 17536213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multipoint linkage analysis. A cautionary note.
    Halpern J; Whittemore AS
    Hum Hered; 1999 Jul; 49(4):194-6. PubMed ID: 10436380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A pure likelihood approach to the analysis of genetic association data: an alternative to Bayesian and frequentist analysis.
    Strug LJ; Hodge SE; Chiang T; Pal DK; Corey PN; Rohde C
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2010 Aug; 18(8):933-41. PubMed ID: 20424645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Model-free linkage analysis using likelihoods.
    Curtis D; Sham PC
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Sep; 57(3):703-16. PubMed ID: 7668300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study comparing precision of the maximum multipoint heterogeneity LOD statistic to three model-free multipoint linkage methods.
    Finch SJ; Chen CH; Gordon D; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):315-25. PubMed ID: 11754467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees.
    Almasy L; Blangero J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 May; 62(5):1198-211. PubMed ID: 9545414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantification of type I error probabilities for heterogeneity LOD scores.
    Abreu PC; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):156-69. PubMed ID: 11788961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample-size guidelines for linkage analysis of a dominant locus for a quantitative trait by the method of lod scores.
    Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Aug; 47(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 2378347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robust multipoint simultaneous identical-by-descent mapping for two linked loci.
    Lin WY; Schaid DJ
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17215580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: LOD-score considerations for confirmation of linkage in a heterogeneous trait.
    Dubé MP; Mlodzienski MA; Kibar Z; Farlow MR; Ebers G; Harper P; Kolodny EH; Rouleau GA; Figlewicz DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Mar; 60(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 9042923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Design considerations in a sib-pair study of linkage for susceptibility loci in cancer.
    Kerber RA; Amos CI; Yeap BY; Finkelstein DM; Thomas DC
    BMC Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 9():64. PubMed ID: 18616822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of genotyping error in sib-pair genomewide linkage scans depends crucially upon the method of analysis.
    Walters K
    J Hum Genet; 2005; 50(7):329-337. PubMed ID: 16059746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A posterior probability of linkage-based re-analysis of schizophrenia data yields evidence of linkage to chromosomes 1 and 17.
    Logue MW; Brzustowicz LM; Bassett AS; Chow EW; Vieland VJ
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17019084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Expected monotonicity--a desirable property for evidence measures?
    Hodge SE; Vieland VJ
    Hum Hered; 2010; 70(3):151-66. PubMed ID: 20664208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.