These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22189797)

  • 1. Voice as Heuristic device to integrate biological and social sciences: a comment to Sidtis & Kreiman's in the Beginning was the Familiar Voice.
    Bertau MC
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2012 Jun; 46(2):160-71. PubMed ID: 22189797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In the beginning was the familiar voice: personally familiar voices in the evolutionary and contemporary biology of communication.
    Sidtis D; Kreiman J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2012 Jun; 46(2):146-59. PubMed ID: 21710374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drawing a distinction between familiar and unfamiliar voice processing: A review of neuropsychological, clinical and empirical findings.
    Stevenage SV
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 116(Pt B):162-178. PubMed ID: 28694095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voice: a pathway to consciousness as "social contact to oneself".
    Bertau MC
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2008 Mar; 42(1):92-113. PubMed ID: 18293051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sorting through the impact of familiarity when processing vocal identity: Results from a voice sorting task.
    Stevenage SV; Symons AE; Fletcher A; Coen C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):519-536. PubMed ID: 31658884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breaking voice identity perception: Expressive voices are more confusable for listeners.
    Lavan N; Burston LF; Ladwa P; Merriman SE; Knight S; McGettigan C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2240-2248. PubMed ID: 30808271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification.
    Perrachione TK; Pierrehumbert JB; Wong PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1950-60. PubMed ID: 19968445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple voices in clinical discourse and as clinical intervention.
    Hengst JA; Duff MC; Prior PA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43 Suppl 1():58-68. PubMed ID: 18432462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification.
    Plante-Hébert J; Boucher VJ; Jemel B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250214. PubMed ID: 33861789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The lost ability to distinguish between self and other voice following a brain lesion.
    Candini M; Avanzi S; Cantagallo A; Zangoli MG; Benassi M; Querzani P; Lotti EM; Iachini T; Frassinetti F
    Neuroimage Clin; 2018; 18():903-911. PubMed ID: 29876275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech spoken by familiar people is more resistant to interference by linguistically similar speech.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1465-1476. PubMed ID: 32105143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Altered Auditory Self-recognition in People with Schizophrenia.
    Pan CC; Zhou AB
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Nov; 23():e52. PubMed ID: 33213608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple levels of linguistic and paralinguistic features contribute to voice recognition.
    Zarate JM; Tian X; Woods KJ; Poeppel D
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11475. PubMed ID: 26088739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception.
    Lavan N; Kreitewolf J; Obleser J; McGettigan C
    Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104780. PubMed ID: 34298232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental improvements in talker recognition are specific to the native language.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Feb; 202():104991. PubMed ID: 33096370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological considerations for interpreting the Language Familiarity Effect in talker processing.
    Levi SV
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 10(2):e1483. PubMed ID: 30328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice recognition in dementia.
    Hailstone JC; Crutch SJ; Warren JD
    Behav Neurol; 2010; 23(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 21422544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.