125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22191292)
1. Comparison of combined oral and i.v. contrast-enhanced versus single i.v. contrast-enhanced mdct for the detection of acute appendicitis.
Hekimoglu K; Yildirim UM; Karabulut E; Coskun M
JBR-BTR; 2011; 94(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 22191292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
Anderson SW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ozonoff A; Jordan JD; Ratevosian J; Ulrich AS; Rathlev NK; Mitchell PM; Rebholz C; Feldman JA; Rhea JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 19843742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.
Keyzer C; Cullus P; Tack D; De Maertelaer V; Bohy P; Gevenois PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1272-81. PubMed ID: 19843741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intravenous and Oral Contrast vs Intravenous Contrast Alone Computed Tomography for the Visualization of Appendix and Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Adult Emergency Department Patients.
Wadhwani A; Guo L; Saude E; Els H; Lang E; McRae A; Bhayana D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug; 67(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 27318889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosing acute appendicitis using a nonoral contrast CT protocol in patients with a BMI of less than 25.
Ramalingam V; Bates DD; Buch K; Uyeda J; Zhao KM; Storer LA; Roberts MB; Lebedis CA; Soto JA; Anderson SW
Emerg Radiol; 2016 Oct; 23(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 27392572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Rhea JT; Milch HN; Ozonoff A; Lucey BC; Soto JA
Emerg Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):445-53. PubMed ID: 20496094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neutral vs positive oral contrast in diagnosing acute appendicitis with contrast-enhanced CT: sensitivity, specificity, reader confidence and interpretation time.
Naeger DM; Chang SD; Kolli P; Shah V; Huang W; Thoeni RF
Br J Radiol; 2011 May; 84(1001):418-26. PubMed ID: 20959365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does enteral contrast increase the accuracy of appendicitis diagnosis?
Latifi A; Labruto F; Kaiser S; Ullberg U; Sundin A; Torkzad MR
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 21406706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients.
Kepner AM; Bacasnot JV; Stahlman BA
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 30(9):1765-73. PubMed ID: 22633722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acute appendicitis in childhood: oral contrast does not improve CT diagnosis.
Farrell CR; Bezinque AD; Tucker JM; Michiels EA; Betz BW
Emerg Radiol; 2018 Jun; 25(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 29306977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis.
Pickhardt PJ; Lawrence EM; Pooler BD; Bruce RJ
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(12):789-96, W-291. PubMed ID: 21690593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Focused helical CT using rectal contrast material only as the preferred technique for the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing three different techniques.
Hershko DD; Awad N; Fischer D; Mahajna A; Guralnik L; Israelit SH; Krausz MM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1223-9. PubMed ID: 17566826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Wijetunga R; Doust B; Bigg-Wither G
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2003 Apr; 24(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 12744503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced Helical CT.
Kaiser S; Finnbogason T; Jorulf HK; Söderman E; Frenckner B
Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 15031433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive Oral Contrast Solution at MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Rate of Appendiceal Luminal Filling of Normal and Inflamed Appendixes.
Tang SJ; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DU; Pooler BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Nov; 213(5):W211-W217. PubMed ID: 31483140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. MDCT for suspected appendicitis: effect of reconstruction section thickness on diagnostic accuracy, rate of appendiceal visualization, and reader confidence using axial images.
Johnson PT; Horton KM; Kawamoto S; Eng J; Bean MJ; Shan SJ; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 19304692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans.
Seo H; Lee KH; Kim HJ; Kim K; Kang SB; Kim SY; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19542400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis.
Kim SY; Lee KH; Kim K; Kim TY; Lee HS; Hwang SS; Song KJ; Kang HS; Kim YH; Rhee JE
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):437-45. PubMed ID: 21633052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suspected appendicitis in children: rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT.
Kharbanda AB; Taylor GA; Bachur RG
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 17456874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
