These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22191735)

  • 1. Stakeholder views on financing carbon capture and storage demonstration projects in China.
    Reiner D; Liang X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):643-51. PubMed ID: 22191735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Carbon capture and storage (CCS) and its potential role to mitigate carbon emission in China].
    Chen WY; Wu ZX; Wang WZ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Jun; 28(6):1178-82. PubMed ID: 17674718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Water use at pulverized coal power plants with postcombustion carbon capture and storage.
    Zhai H; Rubin ES; Versteeg PL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2479-85. PubMed ID: 21329343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
    Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China.
    Ancora MP; Zhang L; Wang S; Schreifels J; Hao J
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Jul; 33():125-34. PubMed ID: 26141885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe storage and effective monitoring of CO2 in depleted gas fields.
    Jenkins CR; Cook PJ; Ennis-King J; Undershultz J; Boreham C; Dance T; de Caritat P; Etheridge DM; Freifeld BM; Hortle A; Kirste D; Paterson L; Pevzner R; Schacht U; Sharma S; Stalker L; Urosevic M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jan; 109(2):E35-41. PubMed ID: 22184225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage.
    Esposito RA; Monroe LS; Friedman JS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 20722437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of amine-tethered solid sorbents for direct CO2 capture from the ambient air.
    Choi S; Drese JH; Eisenberger PM; Jones CW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2420-7. PubMed ID: 21323309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impacts of carbon markets and subsidies on carbon capture and storage retrofitting of existing coal-fired units in China.
    Li K; Yang J; Wei Y
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 326(Pt B):116824. PubMed ID: 36442336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early public impressions of terrestrial carbon capture and storage in a coal-intensive state.
    Carley SR; Krause RM; Warren DC; Rupp JA; Graham JD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7086-93. PubMed ID: 22681614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage.
    Sekar A; Williams E; Chester M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11705-12. PubMed ID: 25187199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
    Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China.
    Yuan J; Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47438-47454. PubMed ID: 36738409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impacts of geochemical reactions on geologic carbon sequestration.
    Jun YS; Giammar DE; Werth CJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 23130971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decarbonizing the Coal-Fired Power Sector in China via Carbon Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage Technology.
    Wei N; Jiao Z; Ellett K; Ku AY; Liu S; Middleton R; Li X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 55(19):13164-13173. PubMed ID: 34549588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing the energy penalty costs of postcombustion CCS systems with amine-storage.
    Patiño-Echeverri D; Hoppock DC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):1243-52. PubMed ID: 22214538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.