These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22191941)

  • 1. Use of stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis to support sustainable management of contaminated sediments.
    Sparrevik M; Barton DN; Bates ME; Linkov I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1326-34. PubMed ID: 22191941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of information for managing contaminated sediments.
    Bates ME; Sparrevik M; de Lichy N; Linkov I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9478-85. PubMed ID: 24957130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk-based decision making to manage contaminated sediments.
    Bridges TS; Apitz SE; Evison L; Keckler K; Logan M; Nadeau S; Wenning RJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16640318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of life cycle assessments to evaluate the environmental footprint of contaminated sediment remediation.
    Sparrevik M; Saloranta T; Cornelissen G; Eek E; Fet AM; Breedveld GD; Linkov I
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(10):4235-41. PubMed ID: 21520943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritization of sediment management alternatives using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis.
    Alvarez-Guerra M; Canis L; Voulvoulis N; Viguri JR; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4354-67. PubMed ID: 20673964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicriteria-based methodology for site prioritisation in sediment management.
    Alvarez-Guerra M; Viguri JR; Voulvoulis N
    Environ Int; 2009 Aug; 35(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 19443035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats.
    Linkov I; Seager TP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5068-74. PubMed ID: 21524065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From ecological risk assessments to risk governance: evaluation of the Norwegian management system for contaminated sediments.
    Sparrevik M; Breedveld GD
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Apr; 6(2):240-8. PubMed ID: 19694494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk-based economic decision analysis of remediation options at a PCE-contaminated site.
    Lemming G; Friis-Hansen P; Bjerg PL
    J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1169-82. PubMed ID: 20117877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicriteria decision analysis: a comprehensive decision approach for management of contaminated sediments.
    Linkov I; Satterstrom FK; Kiker G; Seager TP; Bridges T; Gardner KH; Rogers SH; Belluck DA; Meyer A
    Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 16492181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating sediment stability within the management of contaminated sediment sites: a synthesis approach.
    Bohlen WF; Erickson MJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16640313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation.
    Wenning RJ; Sorensen M; Magar VS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16640319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicriteria decision analysis to assess options for managing contaminated sediments: Application to Southern Busan Harbor, South Korea.
    Kim J; Kim SH; Hong GH; Suedel BC; Clarke J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 20821674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal in Oslo harbor.
    Sparrevik M; Ellen GJ; Duijn M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20809566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends.
    Huang IB; Keisler J; Linkov I
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3578-94. PubMed ID: 21764422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of multicriteria decision analysis to support weight of evidence evaluation.
    Linkov I; Welle P; Loney D; Tkachuk A; Canis L; Kim JB; Bridges T
    Risk Anal; 2011 Aug; 31(8):1211-25. PubMed ID: 21371061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated sites.
    Critto A; Cantarella L; Carlon C; Giove S; Petruzzelli G; Marcomini A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jul; 2(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 16869441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process.
    Promentilla MA; Furuichi T; Ishii K; Tanikawa N
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(12):1410-21. PubMed ID: 16412627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications.
    Linkov I; Satterstrom FK; Kiker G; Batchelor C; Bridges T; Ferguson E
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):1072-93. PubMed ID: 16905190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Framework for determining optimal strategy for sustainable remediation of contaminated sediment: A case study in Northern Taiwan.
    Zheng ZJ; Lin MY; Chiueh PT; Lo SL
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 654():822-831. PubMed ID: 30448672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.