250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22192099)
1. Perioperative and renal function outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for T1b and T2a kidney tumors.
Brewer K; O'Malley RL; Hayn M; Safwat MW; Kim H; Underwood W; Schwaab T
J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 22192099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive heminephrectomy: feasibility and outcomes.
Sobey S; Hakimi AA; Faleck D; Ghavamian R
J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):866-70. PubMed ID: 22360474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass: redefining the minimally invasive 'gold standard'.
Emara AM; Kommu SS; Hindley RG; Barber NJ
BJU Int; 2014 Jan; 113(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 24053473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic partial nephrectomy: imperative vs elective indications.
Long JA; Lee B; Eyraud R; Autorino R; Hillyer S; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH; Haber GP
Urology; 2012 Oct; 80(4):833-7. PubMed ID: 23021664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propensity-score matched analysis comparing robot-assisted with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Wu Z; Li M; Song S; Ye H; Yang Q; Liu B; Cai C; Yang B; Xiao L; Chen Q; Lü C; Gao X; Xu C; Gao X; Hou J; Wang L; Sun Y
BJU Int; 2015 Mar; 115(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 24731125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors larger than 7 cm: a single-center experience.
Malkoc E; Ramirez D; Kara O; Maurice MJ; Nelson RJ; Caputo PA; Kaouk JH
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):781-787. PubMed ID: 27663423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes.
Simmons MN; Weight CJ; Gill IS
Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 19394509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A propensity-matched comparison of perioperative complications and of chronic kidney disease between robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and radiofrequency ablative therapy.
Kim SH; Lee ES; Kim HH; Kwak C; Ku JH; Lee SE; Hong SK; Jeong CW; Kim SH; Cho JY; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Byun SS
Asian J Surg; 2015 Jul; 38(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 25458737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Partial vs radical nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: an analysis from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Nephrectomy Audit.
Hadjipavlou M; Khan F; Fowler S; Joyce A; Keeley FX; Sriprasad S;
BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 25754386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes.
Deklaj T; Lifshitz DA; Shikanov SA; Katz MH; Zorn KC; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1603-7. PubMed ID: 20932215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor enucleation vs sharp excision in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: technical benefit without impact on functional or oncologic outcomes.
Mukkamala A; Allam CL; Ellison JS; Hafez KS; Miller DC; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Wolf JS
Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1294-9. PubMed ID: 24713137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Vricella GJ; Murray S; Boncher NA; Madi R
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1806-10. PubMed ID: 21040363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional analysis of elective nephron-sparing surgery vs radical nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm.
Roos FC; Brenner W; Thomas C; Jäger W; Thüroff JW; Hampel C; Jones J
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):607-13. PubMed ID: 22386408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher).
Jang HJ; Song W; Suh YS; Jeong US; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Choi HY; Seo SI
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):808-13. PubMed ID: 25512815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Similar functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T1a renal cell carcinoma.
Iizuka J; Kondo T; Hashimoto Y; Kobayashi H; Ikezawa E; Takagi T; Omae K; Tanabe K
Int J Urol; 2012 Nov; 19(11):980-6. PubMed ID: 22735049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Minimally invasive vs. open partial nephrectomy : Perioperative success and complication rates].
Boy A; Hein J; Bollow M; Lazica D; Roosen A; Ubrig B
Urologe A; 2018 Jul; 57(7):821-827. PubMed ID: 29691592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cryoablation versus minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for small renal masses in the solitary kidney: impact of approach on functional outcomes.
Panumatrassamee K; Kaouk JH; Autorino R; Lenis AT; Laydner H; Isac W; Long JA; Eyraud R; Kassab A; Khalifeh A; Hillyer S; Rizkala E; Haber GP; Stein RJ
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):818-22. PubMed ID: 23009872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy after adjusting for tumor complexity.
Gin GE; Maschino AC; Spaliviero M; Vertosick EA; Bernstein ML; Coleman JA
Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1355-60. PubMed ID: 25288573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2005; 19(6):634-42. PubMed ID: 16053351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional and oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy of solitary kidneys.
La Rochelle J; Shuch B; Riggs S; Liang LJ; Saadat A; Kabbinavar F; Pantuck A; Belldegrun A
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2037-42; discussion 2043. PubMed ID: 19298974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
