These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22192217)

  • 1. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information.
    Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 22192217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Börner V; Teuscher F; Reinsch N
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2097-107. PubMed ID: 22459855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of sire mating patterns on future genetic merit and inbreeding in a closed beef cattle population.
    Oyama K; Nojima M; Shojo M; Fukushima M; Anada K; Mukai F
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 17488357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic inbreeding coefficients using imputation genotypes: Assessing the effect of ancestral genotyping in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
    Dadousis C; Ablondi M; Cipolat-Gotet C; van Kaam JT; Finocchiaro R; Marusi M; Cassandro M; Sabbioni A; Summer A
    J Dairy Sci; 2024 Aug; 107(8):5869-5880. PubMed ID: 38490541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved dairy cattle mating plans at herd level using genomic information.
    Bérodier M; Berg P; Meuwissen T; Boichard D; Brochard M; Ducrocq V
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100016. PubMed ID: 33516018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms.
    Weigel KA; Hoffman PC; Herring W; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2215-25. PubMed ID: 22459867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of inbreeding depression in Holstein cattle using whole-genome SNP markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding.
    Bjelland DW; Weigel KA; Vukasinovic N; Nkrumah JD
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4697-706. PubMed ID: 23684028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Weigel KA; de los Campos G; González-Recio O; Naya H; Wu XL; Long N; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5248-57. PubMed ID: 19762843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of SNP genotyping to determine pedigree and breed composition of dairy cattle in Kenya.
    Gorbach DM; Makgahlela ML; Reecy JM; Kemp SJ; Baltenweck I; Ouma R; Mwai O; Marshall K; Murdoch B; Moore S; Rothschild MF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Oct; 127(5):348-51. PubMed ID: 20831558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data.
    Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):2114-7. PubMed ID: 21427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Producer breeding objectives and optimal sire selection.
    Tozer PR; Stokes JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3518-25. PubMed ID: 12512626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.