These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22193659)

  • 21. Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Cooper NJ; Abrams KR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1230-41. PubMed ID: 21530169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A robust P-value for treatment effect in meta-analysis with publication bias.
    Copas JB; Malley PF
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4267-78. PubMed ID: 18384185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS; Qadan M; Hornung CA; Galandiuk S
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
    Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis.
    Song F; Gilbody S
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis by P. Macaskill, S. D. Walter and L. Irwig, Statistics in Medicine, 2001; 20:641-654.
    Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(12):1803; author reply 1804. PubMed ID: 12111913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
    Timmer A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Barendregt JJ; Doi SAR
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Dec; 16(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 29621038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Biases in meta-analysis].
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Sillero-Arenas M
    Med Clin (Barc); 1999; 112 Suppl 1():43-50. PubMed ID: 10618799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity.
    Stuck AE; Rubenstein LZ; Wieland D
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):469; author reply 470-1. PubMed ID: 9492685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity.
    Begg CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):865-6. PubMed ID: 16085189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Asymmetry in funnel plot.
    Kaneda H
    Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(2):330-1. PubMed ID: 21712109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detecting and correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis - A truncated normal distribution approach.
    Zhu Q; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2722-2741. PubMed ID: 28024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Publication bias in research synthesis: sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions.
    Vevea JL; Woods CM
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):428-43. PubMed ID: 16392998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
    Riley RD; Gates S; Neilson J; Alfirevic Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 21109399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.