These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22193944)

  • 1. A laboratory study on the reliability estimations of the mini-CEX.
    Alves de Lima A; Conde D; Costabel J; Corso J; Van der Vleuten C
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Mar; 18(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 22193944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Cook DA; Dupras DM; Beckman TJ; Thomas KG; Pankratz VS
    J Gen Intern Med; 2009 Jan; 24(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 19002533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptability and feasibility of mini-clinical evaluation exercise as a formative assessment tool for workplace-based assessment for surgical postgraduate students.
    Joshi MK; Singh T; Badyal DK
    J Postgrad Med; 2017; 63(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 28272063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: A BEME review: BEME Guide No. 59.
    Mortaz Hejri S; Jalili M; Masoomi R; Shirazi M; Nedjat S; Norcini J
    Med Teach; 2020 Feb; 42(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 31524016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does scale length matter? A comparison of nine- versus five-point rating scales for the mini-CEX.
    Cook DA; Beckman TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Dec; 14(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 19034679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia training.
    Weller JM; Jolly B; Misur MP; Merry AF; Jones A; Crossley JG; Pedersen K; Smith K
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 May; 102(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 19336537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity, reliability, feasibility and satisfaction of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for cardiology residency training.
    Alves de Lima A; Barrero C; Baratta S; Castillo Costa Y; Bortman G; Carabajales J; Conde D; Galli A; Degrange G; Van der Vleuten C
    Med Teach; 2007 Oct; 29(8):785-90. PubMed ID: 17917984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the rating result reliable? A new approach to respond to a medical trainee's concerns about the reliability of Mini-CEX assessment.
    Chen YY; Chiu YC; Chu TS; Hsu HY; Chen HL; Wu CC; Huang TS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2022 May; 121(5):943-949. PubMed ID: 34294498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Educational Impact of Mini-CEX Using Clinical Encounter Card System among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
    Zarreen A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 Nov; 28(11):868-871. PubMed ID: 30369381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise in the Era of Milestones and Entrustable Professional Activities in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Resume or Reform?
    Johnson NR; Pelletier A; Berkowitz LR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Jun; 42(6):718-725. PubMed ID: 31882285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation.
    Norcini JJ; Blank LL; Arnold GK; Kimball HR
    Ann Intern Med; 1995 Nov; 123(10):795-9. PubMed ID: 7574198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More consensus than idiosyncrasy: Categorizing social judgments to examine variability in Mini-CEX ratings.
    Gingerich A; van der Vleuten CP; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2014 Nov; 89(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 25250753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the use of the mini-CEX in the foundation programme.
    Jackson D; Wall D
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2010 Oct; 71(10):584-8. PubMed ID: 21085077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the influence of gender, seniority and specialty on paper and computer-based feedback provision during mini-CEX assessments in a busy emergency department.
    Chang YC; Lee CH; Chen CK; Liao CH; Ng CJ; Chen JC; Chaou CH
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Mar; 22(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 27112960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementing the undergraduate mini-CEX: a tailored approach at Southampton University.
    Hill F; Kendall K; Galbraith K; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):326-34. PubMed ID: 19335574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties?
    Mitchell C; Bhat S; Herbert A; Baker P
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1190-8. PubMed ID: 21995509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of consultation skills assessments using standardised versus real patients.
    Reinders ME; Blankenstein AH; van Marwijk HW; Knol DL; Ram P; van der Horst HE; de Vet HC; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 21564197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of Mini-CEX Assessment of Medical Students in General Practice Clinical Attachments.
    Eggleton K; Goodyear-Smith F; Paton L; Falloon K; Wong C; Lack L; Kennelly J; Fishman T; Moyes SA
    Fam Med; 2016 Sep; 48(8):624-30. PubMed ID: 27655195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills.
    Norcini JJ; Blank LL; Duffy FD; Fortna GS
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Mar; 138(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 12639081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of a Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) Program to Assess the Clinical Competence of Postgraduate Trainees in Pediatrics.
    Khalil S; Aggarwal A; Mishra D
    Indian Pediatr; 2017 Apr; 54(4):284-287. PubMed ID: 28159950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.