These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22194036)

  • 1. Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
    Singleton A; Erby LH; Foisie KV; Kaphingst KA
    J Genet Couns; 2012 Jun; 21(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 22194036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Helping Patients Make Informed Choices.
    Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2018 Feb; 22(1):33-36. PubMed ID: 29350705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information Provision Regarding Health-Related Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Dutch Consumers: An in-Depth Content Analysis of Sellers' Websites.
    Bruins D; Onstwedder SM; Cornel MC; Ausems MGEM; van Mil MHW; Rigter T
    Genes (Basel); 2024 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 38674451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations.
    Skirton H; Goldsmith L; Jackson L; O'Connor A
    Clin Genet; 2012 Sep; 82(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 22372614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Hong Kong.
    Hui VCC; Li HC; Chow JHK; Ng CSC; Lui CYW; Fung JLF; Mak CCY; Chung BHY; Lau KK
    J Genet Couns; 2021 Dec; 30(6):1640-1648. PubMed ID: 33938075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats.
    Okan Y; Smith SG; Bruine de Bruin W
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e029551. PubMed ID: 31662361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information Provided to Consumers about Direct-to-Consumer Nutrigenetic Testing.
    De S; Pietilä AM; Iso-Touru T; Hopia A; Tahvonen R; Vähäkangas K
    Public Health Genomics; 2019; 22(5-6):162-173. PubMed ID: 31779000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.
    Wasson K; Sanders TN; Hogan NS; Cherny S; Helzlsouer KJ
    J Community Genet; 2013 Oct; 4(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 23832288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who are you going to call? Primary care patients' disclosure decisions regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
    Wasson K; Cherny S; Sanders TN; Hogan NS; Helzlsouer KJ
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2014; 4(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 24748260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing on Australian clinical genetics services.
    Millward M; Tiller J; Bogwitz M; Kincaid H; Taylor S; Trainer AH; Lacaze P
    Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Sep; 63(9):103968. PubMed ID: 32502649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk communication and informed consent in the medical tourism industry: a thematic content analysis of Canadian broker websites.
    Penney K; Snyder J; Crooks VA; Johnston R
    BMC Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 12():17. PubMed ID: 21943392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personal genomic testing for nutrition and wellness in Australia: A content analysis of online information.
    Tutty E; Hickerton C; Adamski MM; Metcalfe SA
    Nutr Diet; 2019 Jul; 76(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 30693631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.
    Mavroidopoulou V; Xera E; Mollaki V
    J Hum Genet; 2015 Sep; 60(9):515-23. PubMed ID: 26040209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.
    Niemiec E; Borry P; Pinxten W; Howard HC
    Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 27647801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing, advising, or persuading? An assessment of bone mineral density testing information from consumer health websites.
    Green CJ; Kazanjian A; Helmer D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15209175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners' daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients' intentions towards this approach.
    Cohidon C; Cardinaux R; Cornuz J; Chenal R; Desvergne B; Guessous I; Cerqui D; Widmer D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(1):79. PubMed ID: 33902442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct-to-Consumer Genomic Testing Through an Ethics Lens: Oncology Nursing Considerations.
    VerStrate CA; Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2023 Jul; 27(4):380-388. PubMed ID: 37677769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
    Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct to consumer genetic and genomic testing with associated implications for advanced nursing practice.
    Aleman KM; Chipman M; Peck JL; Hughes AK; Murphey C
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2021 Jun; 34(2):381-388. PubMed ID: 34107502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can online consumers contribute to drug knowledge? A mixed-methods comparison of consumer-generated and professionally controlled psychotropic medication information on the internet.
    Hughes S; Cohen D
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Jul; 13(3):e53. PubMed ID: 21807607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.