These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22194503)

  • 1. Digital mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jan; 198(1):240. PubMed ID: 22194503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [FCR mammography system with improved image quality].
    Arakawa S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):697-9. PubMed ID: 12881673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Soft copy versus hard copy findings in digital mammography].
    Funke M; Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 12063733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammographic screening in Japan.
    Ishibashi T; Kawasumi Y; Yamada T; Sai M; Uematsu T; Uchiyama N
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 20072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital mammography in Japan.
    Uematsu T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):158. PubMed ID: 20072820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical evaluations of full field digital mammography].
    Uchiyama N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jan; 59(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 12703491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided detection with full-field digital mammography.
    Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2006 May; 21(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16718969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
    Parikh J; Fanus D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The basics and implementation of digital mammography.
    Zuley ML
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 20868892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary on: A comparison of two digital mammography systems: are there any differences?
    Young KC
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jan; 71(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 26683091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.
    Burgess A
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1987-95. PubMed ID: 15305451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.